GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies—from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations

dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Reem A.
dc.contributor.authorBrožek, Jan L.
dc.contributor.authorSantesso, Nancy A.
dc.contributor.authorBossuyt, Patrick M.M.
dc.contributor.authorSteingart, Karen R.
dc.contributor.authorLeeflang, Mariska M.G.
dc.contributor.authorLange, Stefan F.
dc.contributor.authorTrenti, Tommaso
dc.contributor.authorLangendam, Miranda W.
dc.contributor.authorSchölten, Rob J.P.M.
dc.contributor.authorHooft, Lotty ’t
dc.contributor.authorMurad, Mohammad Hassan
dc.contributor.authorJaeschke, Roman Z.
dc.contributor.authorRutjes, Anne W.S.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jasvinder A.
dc.contributor.authorHelfand, Mark
dc.contributor.authorGlasziou, Paul P.
dc.contributor.authorArevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorDeeks, Jonathan J.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Guyatt H.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:56:00Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:56:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This article describes the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group's framework of moving from test accuracy to patient or population-important outcomes. We focus on the common scenario when studies directly evaluating the effect of diagnostic and other tests or strategies on health outcomes are not available or are not providing the best available evidence. Study Design and Setting: Using practical examples, we explored how guideline developers and other decision makers can use information from test accuracy to develop a recommendation by linking evidence that addresses downstream consequences. Guideline panels should develop an analytic framework that summarizes the actions that follow from applying a test and the consequences. Results: We describe GRADE's current thinking about the overall certainty of the evidence (also known as quality of the evidence or confidence in the estimates) arising from consideration of the often complex pathways that involve multiple tests and management options. Each link in the evidence can—and often does—lower the overall certainty of the evidence required to formulate recommendations and make decisions about tests. The frequency with which an outcome occurs and its importance will influence whether or not a particular step in the linked evidence is critical to decision-making. Conclusions: Overall certainty may be expressed by the weakest critical step in the linked evidence. The linked approach to addressing optimal testing will often require the use of decision analytic approaches. We present an example that involves decision modeling in a GRADE Evidence to Decision framework for cervical cancer screening. However, because resources and time of guideline developers may be limited, we describe alternative, pragmatic strategies for developing recommendations addressing test use. © 2019
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.003
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85062971920
dc.identifier.pmid30738926
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31231
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier USA
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectFrameworks
dc.subjectGrade
dc.subjectGuidelines
dc.subjectRecommendations
dc.subjectSystematic reviews
dc.subjectTests
dc.subjectGrade approach
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectOutcome assessment, health care
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectClinical decision making
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPractice guideline
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.titleGRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies—from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7482.pdf
Size:
1.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format