Allogeneic stem cell transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and karnofsky performance status score less than or equal to 80%: A study from the acute leukemia working party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract
Limited data are currently available on the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) with a reduced performance status. We herein present the results of a registry study on 2,936 AML patients undergoing allo-SCT in first remission (CR1) with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score less than or equal to 80%. Two-year leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, and relapse-free survival (GRFS) rates were 54%, 59%, and 41%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with a KPS score = 80% had lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and superior OS in comparison to patients with a KPS score <80% (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with a KPS score =80%, a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen was associated with an increased risk of relapse (p = 0.002) and lower GRFS (p < 0.001) compared to myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Differently, in patients with a KPS score <80%, a RIC regimen resulted in lower NRM (p < 0.001), whereas relapse incidence did not differ, thus leading to an improved GRFS (p = 0.008) as compared to MAC. A transplant from a matched sibling donor (MSD) was associated with a reduced incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (p < 0.01) and NRM (p < 0.01) in comparison to other donor types. In conclusion, allo-SCT appears feasible in AML patients with a jeopardized KPS score. Survival is significantly affected by the conditioning intensity, which should be adjusted according to the severity of KPS impairment. © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Description
Keywords
Acute myeloid leukemia, Allogeneic stem cell transplant, Karnofsky performance status score, Myeloablative conditioning, Reduced intensity conditioning, Adult, Clinical decision-making, Disease progression, Female, Graft vs host disease, Humans, Karnofsky performance status, Leukemia, myeloid, acute, Male, Middle aged, Predictive value of tests, Progression-free survival, Recurrence, Registries, Retrospective studies, Risk assessment, Risk factors, Stem cell transplantation, Time factors, Transplantation conditioning, Transplantation, homologous, Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, Cyclosporine, Fludarabine, Melphalan, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate mofetil, Thymocyte antibody, Acute graft versus host disease, Aged, Allogeneic stem cell transplantation, Article, Cancer regression, Cancer specific survival, Chronic graft versus host disease, Cohort analysis, Controlled study, Disease free survival, Engraftment, Feasibility study, Graft versus host disease free and relapse free survival, Graft versus host reaction, Haploidentical transplantation, Human, Incidence, Intermethod comparison, Major clinical study, Mortality, Non relapse mortality, Overall survival, Priority journal, Recurrence risk, Retrospective study, Sibling donor, Survival rate, Whole body radiation, Adverse event, Allotransplantation, Clinical decision making, Disease exacerbation, Predictive value, Recurrent disease, Register, Risk factor, Time factor