When and how to update systematic reviews: Consensus and checklist

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGarner, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorHopewell, Sally
dc.contributor.authorChandler, Jackie
dc.contributor.authorMacLehose, Harriet G.
dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorBeyene, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorChang, Stephanie M.
dc.contributor.authorChurchill, Rachel C.
dc.contributor.authorDearness, Karin L.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Guyatt H.
dc.contributor.authorLefebvre, Carol
dc.contributor.authorLiles, Beth
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorMartínez García, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMavergames, Chris
dc.contributor.authorNasser, Mona
dc.contributor.authorQaseem, Amir
dc.contributor.authorSampson, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorSoares-Weiser, Karla V.
dc.contributor.authorTakwoingi, Yemisi
dc.contributor.authorThabane, Lehana
dc.contributor.authorTrivella, Marialena
dc.contributor.authorTugwell, Peter S.L.
dc.contributor.authorWelsh, Emma J.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Edward C.F.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:48:07Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:48:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractUpdating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review. © 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3507
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84979703390
dc.identifier.pmid27443385
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30793
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ (Online)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdvisory committees
dc.subjectCanada
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectConsensus
dc.subjectGuidelines as topic
dc.subjectPublishing
dc.subjectReview literature as topic
dc.subjectAccess to information
dc.subjectAuthor
dc.subjectConceptual framework
dc.subjectData analysis
dc.subjectDecision framework
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectInformation processing
dc.subjectMedical literature
dc.subjectPeer review
dc.subjectPractice guideline
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectPublication
dc.subjectQuality control
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSystematic review (topic)
dc.subjectSystematic review updating
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectAdvisory committee
dc.subjectLiterature
dc.subjectStandards
dc.titleWhen and how to update systematic reviews: Consensus and checklist
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9767.pdf
Size:
311.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Internal Medicine