Success of Endoscopic Laser Cyclophotocoagulation vs Repeat Transscleral Treatment after Prior Transscleral Cycloablation

dc.contributor.authorAl-Haddad, Christiane Elias
dc.contributor.authorBarikian, Anita W.
dc.contributor.authorMoussawi, Zeinab El
dc.contributor.authorNasser, Nour A.
dc.contributor.authorNoureddine, Bahaa’
dc.contributor.authorBashshur, Ziad F.
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:08:56Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:08:56Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the efficacy of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) vs repeat transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TCP) in eyes with persistent glaucoma despite prior treatment with TCP. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective chart review of glaucoma patients at the American University of Beirut Medical Center over 10 years who underwent ECP or repeat TCP. We reported qualified and complete success; success was defined as postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mm Hg, with (qualified) or without medications (complete) and without procedure-related complications. Results: This study included 23 eyes of 21 patients with various forms of uncontrolled glaucoma who had failed TCP. A total of 13 eyes of 12 patients underwent ECP with a mean age of 39.9 ± 23.2 years, and 10 eyes of nine patients underwent repeat TCP with a mean age of 27.2 ± 22.6 years. A significant decrease in IOP was observed from 38.5 ± 7.9 mm Hg preoperatively to 25.2 ± 8.8 mm Hg postrepeat TCP (p = 0.006) and from 33.0 ± 9.5 to 12.8 ± 3.9 mm Hg post-ECP (p < 0.001), noted at a mean follow-up time of 39.2 ± 44.4 and 41.5 ± 37.4 months, respectively. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications decreased in the two groups (from 3.8 ± 1.0 preoperatively to 1.8 ± 0.9 postoperatively for ECP and from 3.5 ± 1.3 to 3.1 ± 0.9 postoperatively for TCP); however, the drop was only statistically significant post-ECP. Qualified success was significantly higher after ECP vs repeat TCP (91.7 vs 40%, respectively). Complete success was achieved only in 1/12 (8.3%) eyes in the ECP group. Conclusion: Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) performed in glaucomatous eyes previously treated with transscleral cycloablation provided more IOP control as compared to repeat TCP by directly treating viable tissue in previously skipped ciliary processes and in between processes. Clinical significance: In glaucomatous eyes previously treated with transscleral cycloablation, ECP attained better IOP control than repeat transscleral cycloablation. © The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1426
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85183407886
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31954
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Current Glaucoma Practice
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEndoscopic cyclophotocoagulation
dc.subjectGlaucoma
dc.subjectTransscleral cycloablation
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.subjectDexamethasone
dc.subjectAblation therapy
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectAspiration
dc.subjectClosed angle glaucoma
dc.subjectCongenital glaucoma
dc.subjectEndoscopic laser cyclophotocoagulation
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow up
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectIntraocular pressure
dc.subjectLaser coagulation
dc.subjectLensectomy
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOpen angle glaucoma
dc.subjectParacentesis
dc.subjectPars plana vitrectomy
dc.subjectPhacoemulsification
dc.subjectPostoperative period
dc.subjectRegional anesthesia
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.subjectSclerotomy
dc.subjectSecondary glaucoma
dc.subjectTrabeculectomy
dc.subjectTransscleral cyclophotocoagulation
dc.subjectTreatment failure
dc.subjectVisual acuity
dc.titleSuccess of Endoscopic Laser Cyclophotocoagulation vs Repeat Transscleral Treatment after Prior Transscleral Cycloablation
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-443.pdf
Size:
14.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections