Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
| dc.contributor.author | Chalala, Chimène | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghafari, Joseph George | |
| dc.contributor.department | Dentofacial Medicine | |
| dc.contributor.department | Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T12:21:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T12:21:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Aims: To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness. Material and Methods: A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodontic patients (age 25.98 ± 8.43 years) screened at our university orthodontic clinic. The lateral cephalographs of the orthodontic patients were stratified in four groups: flat, normal toward flat, normal toward full, full,according to distances from nasion and sella to points J and G (NJ, SJ, NG and SG). J is the midpoint of the distance connecting orbitale to point A, and G the center of the triangle connecting orbit, key ridge and pterygomaxillary fissure. Statistics included the Kendall tau-b test for best associations among measurements. Results: All measurements were statistically significantly different between flat and full groups. The highest associations were between NJ and SJ (tb = 0.71; p < 0.001) and NG and SG (tb = 0.70; p < 0.001). Flat midfaces were characterized by canting of the cranial base and palatal plane, hyperdivergent pattern and maxillary retrognathism. The opposite was true for fuller midfaces. Conclusion: Midface skeletal location was assessed differentially in the naso-maxillary and malo-zygomatic structures differentially. Craniofacial characteristics were identified according to this stratification, indicating the potential for application in facial diagnosis and need for testing on 3D cone-beam computed tomography images. © 2019 Chalala and Ghafari | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85076565435 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/34479 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | PeerJ Inc. | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | PeerJ | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Cephalometric landmarks | |
| dc.subject | Maxillary flatness | |
| dc.subject | Maxillary fullness | |
| dc.subject | Midface position | |
| dc.subject | Adult | |
| dc.subject | Anatomic landmark | |
| dc.subject | Article | |
| dc.subject | Cephalometry | |
| dc.subject | Clinical assessment | |
| dc.subject | Differential diagnosis | |
| dc.subject | Face profile | |
| dc.subject | Facial nerve | |
| dc.subject | Human | |
| dc.subject | Jaw | |
| dc.subject | Major clinical study | |
| dc.subject | Malocclusion | |
| dc.subject | Maxilla | |
| dc.subject | Orbit | |
| dc.subject | Orthodontics | |
| dc.subject | Retrognathia | |
| dc.subject | Sella turcica | |
| dc.subject | Skull base | |
| dc.subject | Zygoma | |
| dc.title | Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1