Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile

dc.contributor.authorChalala, Chimène
dc.contributor.authorGhafari, Joseph George
dc.contributor.departmentDentofacial Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:21:35Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:21:35Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractAims: To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness. Material and Methods: A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodontic patients (age 25.98 ± 8.43 years) screened at our university orthodontic clinic. The lateral cephalographs of the orthodontic patients were stratified in four groups: flat, normal toward flat, normal toward full, full,according to distances from nasion and sella to points J and G (NJ, SJ, NG and SG). J is the midpoint of the distance connecting orbitale to point A, and G the center of the triangle connecting orbit, key ridge and pterygomaxillary fissure. Statistics included the Kendall tau-b test for best associations among measurements. Results: All measurements were statistically significantly different between flat and full groups. The highest associations were between NJ and SJ (tb = 0.71; p < 0.001) and NG and SG (tb = 0.70; p < 0.001). Flat midfaces were characterized by canting of the cranial base and palatal plane, hyperdivergent pattern and maxillary retrognathism. The opposite was true for fuller midfaces. Conclusion: Midface skeletal location was assessed differentially in the naso-maxillary and malo-zygomatic structures differentially. Craniofacial characteristics were identified according to this stratification, indicating the potential for application in facial diagnosis and need for testing on 3D cone-beam computed tomography images. © 2019 Chalala and Ghafari
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85076565435
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/34479
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPeerJ Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofPeerJ
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCephalometric landmarks
dc.subjectMaxillary flatness
dc.subjectMaxillary fullness
dc.subjectMidface position
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAnatomic landmark
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectCephalometry
dc.subjectClinical assessment
dc.subjectDifferential diagnosis
dc.subjectFace profile
dc.subjectFacial nerve
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectJaw
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMalocclusion
dc.subjectMaxilla
dc.subjectOrbit
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectRetrognathia
dc.subjectSella turcica
dc.subjectSkull base
dc.subjectZygoma
dc.titleDifferentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-3956.pdf
Size:
5.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format