Simulation training in endotracheal intubation in a pediatric residency

dc.contributor.authorSharara-Chami, Rana I.
dc.contributor.authorTaher, Sahar
dc.contributor.authorKaddoum, Roland N.
dc.contributor.authorTamim, Hani Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorCharafeddine, Lama
dc.contributor.departmentPediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.departmentAnesthesiology
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentClinical Research Institute
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:10:32Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:10:32Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBackground: Airway management and endotracheal intubation are essential skills for pediatric residents. Simulation-based technology is used for training residents but it remains unclear whether high fidelity simulation results in better retention of skills compared to low fidelity. The study assesses high fidelity simulation of endotracheal intubation and traditional low fidelity training in improving pediatric residents' knowledge retention and technical skills; and if the difference translates into higher real time intubation success rates. Methods: Second and third year pediatric residents were randomized into high fidelity (intervention) or low fidelity simulation (control) groups. Airway management and intubation skills were taught using a didactic lecture and demonstration on low fidelity mannequins. Knowledge was assessed before randomization (T0) and 6 months after training (T6). Other outcome measures were: 1) airway management and intubation skills at T6 and T12 (12 months later) and 2) successful intubation of actual patients by T12. Results: 10 out of 11 residents completed the intervention. Theoretical knowledge improved for both groups. Participants made less mistakes (M) overtime: M (T0) =3.2 and M (T6) =2.6 for the intervention group, and M (T0) =4 and M (T6) =2.40 for the control. There was no significant effect of fidelity on intubation skills or the number of successful intubations recorded in logbooks (all p >0.05). In some instances intubation skills showed regression over time. Conclusion: High fidelity simulation showed no impact on residents' airway management and intubation skills. Retention of theoretical knowledge persisted over time while practical skills remained at baseline or declined.
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84903381918
dc.identifier.pmid25137864
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32321
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican University of Beirut
dc.relation.ispartofMiddle East Journal of Anesthesiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectIntubation skills
dc.subjectKnowledge assessment
dc.subjectResident education
dc.subjectSimulation
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectClinical competence
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternship and residency
dc.subjectIntubation, intratracheal
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectManikins
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectPilot projects
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectAudiovisual equipment
dc.subjectControlled clinical trial
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectEndotracheal intubation
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMedical education
dc.subjectMethodology
dc.subjectPilot study
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectStatistics
dc.titleSimulation training in endotracheal intubation in a pediatric residency
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2014-10757.pdf
Size:
372.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format