Startup of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic waste : one stage vs two stage -

dc.contributor.authorAl-Sanioura, Dana Nazih
dc.contributor.departmentInterfaculty Graduate Environmental Sciences Program (Environmental Technology)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Architecture
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date2015
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-30T14:15:46Z
dc.date.available2017-08-30T14:15:46Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015
dc.descriptionThesis. M.S.E.S. American University of Beirut. Interfaculty Graduate Environmental Sciences Program, (Environmental Technology), 2015. ET:6169
dc.descriptionAdvisor : Dr. Mutasem El-Fadel, Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering ; Members of Committee : Dr. Sophia Ghanimeh, Assistant Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering NDU, Lebanon ; Dr. Pascal Saikaly, Assistant Professor, Environmental Science and Engineering, KAUST, KSA .
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 37-42; 56-58)
dc.description.abstractThe anaerobic digestion of food waste is an attractive option for waste disposal. In the following study, a one stage digester was compared to a two stage digester for the treatment of food waste under thermophilic temperature. In addition, an innovative strategy for accelerating the startup of a one stage digester while using a fast incremental loading was explored. In this regard, two one-stage bench-top digesters and a two-stage digester were operated to treat food waste under thermophilic temperature in separate studies. In the first study (Appendix A and C), the one stage digester produced 30percent higher specific methane rate and exhibited better stability in terms of lower intermediate-to-partial alkalinity (IA-PA) ratio. However, the two stage digester exhibited better organic matter destruction exhibited by 52 percent lower average TCOD, 64percent lower SCOD and 5percent higher VSpercent reduction than in the one stage system. In the second study (Appendix B), a biomass acclimation strategy that involved gradual and incremental increase of inoculum and loading rate over 20 weeks was contrasted with a faster 12-week startup. Both reactors showed similar operational stability, there was a 30percent reduction in startup time with the fast startup reactor. Despite a 15percent reduction in specific methane generation, it remained within the reported values for similar waste. In addition, the reactor achieved high alkalinity, low overall IA-PA ratio and VSpercent and TCOD removal values within the recommended value.
dc.format.extent1 online resource (xii, 58 leaves) : billustrations ; 30cm
dc.identifier.otherb18330629
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/10930
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofTheses, Dissertations, and Projects
dc.subject.classificationET:006169
dc.subject.lcshFood waste as feed.
dc.subject.lcshOrganic wastes as feed.
dc.subject.lcshBiotechnology.
dc.subject.lcshMethane -- Environmental aspects.
dc.subject.lcshBioreactors.
dc.subject.lcshRefuse and refuse disposal.
dc.titleStartup of thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic waste : one stage vs two stage -
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
et-6169.pdf
Size:
3.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format