A universal hardware-driven PVT and layout-aware predictive failure analytics for SRAM

dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Rajiv V.
dc.contributor.authorSaroop, Sudesh
dc.contributor.authorKanj, Rouwaida N.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yang
dc.contributor.authorWang, Weike
dc.contributor.authorRadens, Carl J.
dc.contributor.authorTan, Yue
dc.contributor.authorYogendra, Karthik
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:29:20Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:29:20Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe impact of device variability, temperature, and technology CAD-based layout parasitics on low-voltage static random access memory (SRAM) yield is explored using a novel variability-aware statistical methodology. Threshold voltage, Vt , mismatches for planar 22- and 14-nm FinFET SRAM transistors are characterized based on unique array-like structures for capturing process voltage and temperature (PVT) impact on variability. In general, the mismatches are shown to be a consistent and unique function of Vdd, doping, and temperature across the two technologies. Stronger Vt mismatch impact is observed as a function of Vdd and doping in the 22-nm technology, with higher mismatch recorded at lower temperatures. In the 14-nm technology, doping is found to have the strongest impact on Vt mismatch, and the mismatch increases with Vdd despite the reduced draininduced barrier lowering effects. Similar to the 22-nm technology, the mismatch increases at lower temperatures. Front-end-of-theline capacitance effects are found to be more significant than back-end-of-the-line effects in 14-nm technologies, as opposed to planar technologies. Accurate parasitic capacitance modeling along with PVT-aware variability process variations for different 22-/14-nm cell arrangements are incorporated into a physicsbased statistical analysis methodology for accurate Vmin analysis. The yield analysis results are corroborated with hardware yield using 4-16-Mb inline SRAM macro monitors. The methodology is unique in the industry, gives insight into the technology-circuit interactions, and is able to effectively predict the SRAM yield bounds. © 2016 IEEE.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/TVLSI.2015.2427196
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84930536188
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/27183
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCapacitance
dc.subjectDibl variability modeling
dc.subjectFast statistical sampling
dc.subjectFinfet
dc.subjectHardware characterization
dc.subjectSram
dc.subjectStatic noise margin (snm)
dc.subjectTechnology computer-aided design (tcad)
dc.subjectVmin
dc.subjectComputer aided design
dc.subjectHardware
dc.subjectIntegrated circuit layout
dc.subjectRandom access storage
dc.subjectStatistical methods
dc.subjectThreshold voltage
dc.subjectBack end of the lines
dc.subjectCapacitance effect
dc.subjectDrain induced barrier lowering effects
dc.subjectFront end of the lines
dc.subjectLower temperatures
dc.subjectParasitic capacitance
dc.subjectStatic random access memory
dc.subjectStatistical methodologies
dc.subjectStatic random access storage
dc.titleA universal hardware-driven PVT and layout-aware predictive failure analytics for SRAM
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-4838.pdf
Size:
5.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format