Expression of HIF-1α and markers of angiogenesis are not significantly different in triple negative breast cancer compared to other breast cancer molecular subtypes: Implications for future therapy
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Abstract
Introduction: Triple negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors rendering it refractory to available targetedtherapies. TNBC is associated with central fibrosis and necrosis, both indicators of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor 1α is up-regulated under hypoxia and its expression is associated with induction of angiogenesis resulting in proliferation, aggressive tumor phenotype and metastasis. In this study we evaluate the potential use of HIF-1α as aTNBC-specific marker. Methods: 62 TNBC, 64 HER2+, and 64 hormone-receptors positive breast cancer cases were evaluated for central fibrosis and necrosis, HIF-1α, HIF-1β, VEGFR3, CD31 expression and microvessel density. RNA extraction from paraffin-embedded samples, followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) evaluation of HIF-1α and VEGF transcripts was performed on 54 cases (18 from each subtype). Results: HIF-1α protein was expressed in 35.5% TNBC, 45.3% HER2+ and 25.0% ER+/PR+ (p = 0.055; χ2 test). PCRanalysis of subgroup of breast cancers, 84.2% expressed HIF-1α protein and its transcripts, while only 66.7% expressed VEGF transcripts simultaneously with the HIF-1α protein and its transcripts. Central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in TNBC (p = 0.015; χ2 test), while MVD was comparable among all groups (p = 0.928; χ2 test). VEGFR3 was highest in TNBC expressing HIF-1α. HIF-1β protein was expressed in 32.0% of HIF-1α(+), and in (44.3%) of HIF-1α(-) breast cancer cases (p = 0.033; χ2 test). Moreover, HIF-1α expression in cases with central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in the HER2+ followed by the TNBC (p = 0.156; χ2test). Conclusions: A proportion of TNBC express HIF-1α but not in a significantly different manner from other breast cancer subtypes. The potential of anti-HIF-1α targeted therapy is therefore not a candidate for exclusive use in TNBC, but should be considered in all breast cancers, especially in the setting of clinically aggressive or refractory disease. © 2015 Yehia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Description
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antigens, cd31, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, Biomarkers, tumor, Breast neoplasms, Female, Forecasting, Gene expression regulation, neoplastic, Humans, Hypoxia-inducible factor 1, alpha subunit, Immunohistochemistry, Middle aged, Molecular targeted therapy, Neovascularization, pathologic, Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Vascular endothelial growth factor a, Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3, Cd31 antigen, Epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Estrogen receptor, Hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha, Hypoxia inducible factor 1beta, Progesterone receptor, Rna, Vasculotropin, Vasculotropin receptor 3, Arnt protein, human, Flt4 protein, human, Tumor marker, Vasculotropin a, Angiogenesis, Article, Breast cancer, Capillary density, Controlled study, Drug targeting, Fibrosis, Human, Human tissue, Major clinical study, Necrosis, Protein expression, Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Rna extraction, Triple negative breast cancer, Antagonists and inhibitors, Comparative study, Gene expression regulation, Genetics, Metabolism, Molecularly targeted therapy, Neovascularization (pathology), Procedures, Trends, Very elderly