Expression of HIF-1α and markers of angiogenesis are not significantly different in triple negative breast cancer compared to other breast cancer molecular subtypes: Implications for future therapy

dc.contributor.authorYehia, Lamis
dc.contributor.authorBoulos, Fouad I.
dc.contributor.authorJabbour, Mark N.
dc.contributor.authorMahfoud, Ziyad R.
dc.contributor.authorFakhruddin, Najla
dc.contributor.authorEl-Sabban, Marwan E.
dc.contributor.departmentAnatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiological Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentPathology and Laboratory Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:36:34Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:36:34Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Triple negative breast cancer lacks estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors rendering it refractory to available targetedtherapies. TNBC is associated with central fibrosis and necrosis, both indicators of tumor hypoxia. Hypoxia inducible factor 1α is up-regulated under hypoxia and its expression is associated with induction of angiogenesis resulting in proliferation, aggressive tumor phenotype and metastasis. In this study we evaluate the potential use of HIF-1α as aTNBC-specific marker. Methods: 62 TNBC, 64 HER2+, and 64 hormone-receptors positive breast cancer cases were evaluated for central fibrosis and necrosis, HIF-1α, HIF-1β, VEGFR3, CD31 expression and microvessel density. RNA extraction from paraffin-embedded samples, followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) evaluation of HIF-1α and VEGF transcripts was performed on 54 cases (18 from each subtype). Results: HIF-1α protein was expressed in 35.5% TNBC, 45.3% HER2+ and 25.0% ER+/PR+ (p = 0.055; χ2 test). PCRanalysis of subgroup of breast cancers, 84.2% expressed HIF-1α protein and its transcripts, while only 66.7% expressed VEGF transcripts simultaneously with the HIF-1α protein and its transcripts. Central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in TNBC (p = 0.015; χ2 test), while MVD was comparable among all groups (p = 0.928; χ2 test). VEGFR3 was highest in TNBC expressing HIF-1α. HIF-1β protein was expressed in 32.0% of HIF-1α(+), and in (44.3%) of HIF-1α(-) breast cancer cases (p = 0.033; χ2 test). Moreover, HIF-1α expression in cases with central fibrosis and necrosis was highest in the HER2+ followed by the TNBC (p = 0.156; χ2test). Conclusions: A proportion of TNBC express HIF-1α but not in a significantly different manner from other breast cancer subtypes. The potential of anti-HIF-1α targeted therapy is therefore not a candidate for exclusive use in TNBC, but should be considered in all breast cancers, especially in the setting of clinically aggressive or refractory disease. © 2015 Yehia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129356
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84934971115
dc.identifier.pmid26046764
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/28637
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAntigens, cd31
dc.subjectAryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator
dc.subjectBiomarkers, tumor
dc.subjectBreast neoplasms
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.subjectGene expression regulation, neoplastic
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHypoxia-inducible factor 1, alpha subunit
dc.subjectImmunohistochemistry
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectMolecular targeted therapy
dc.subjectNeovascularization, pathologic
dc.subjectReverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
dc.subjectVascular endothelial growth factor a
dc.subjectVascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3
dc.subjectCd31 antigen
dc.subjectEpidermal growth factor receptor 2
dc.subjectEstrogen receptor
dc.subjectHypoxia inducible factor 1alpha
dc.subjectHypoxia inducible factor 1beta
dc.subjectProgesterone receptor
dc.subjectRna
dc.subjectVasculotropin
dc.subjectVasculotropin receptor 3
dc.subjectArnt protein, human
dc.subjectFlt4 protein, human
dc.subjectTumor marker
dc.subjectVasculotropin a
dc.subjectAngiogenesis
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectCapillary density
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDrug targeting
dc.subjectFibrosis
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman tissue
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectNecrosis
dc.subjectProtein expression
dc.subjectReverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
dc.subjectRna extraction
dc.subjectTriple negative breast cancer
dc.subjectAntagonists and inhibitors
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectGene expression regulation
dc.subjectGenetics
dc.subjectMetabolism
dc.subjectMolecularly targeted therapy
dc.subjectNeovascularization (pathology)
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectTrends
dc.subjectVery elderly
dc.titleExpression of HIF-1α and markers of angiogenesis are not significantly different in triple negative breast cancer compared to other breast cancer molecular subtypes: Implications for future therapy
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015-10084.pdf
Size:
2.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format