Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials

dc.contributor.authorKasenda, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorVon Elm, Erik B.
dc.contributor.authorYou, John J.
dc.contributor.authorBlümle, Anette
dc.contributor.authorTomonaga, Yuki
dc.contributor.authorSaccilotto, Ramon T.
dc.contributor.authorAmstutz, Alain
dc.contributor.authorBengough, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorMeerpohl, Joerg J.
dc.contributor.authorStegert, Mihaela
dc.contributor.authorTikkinen, Kari A.O.
dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco-Labra, Alonso
dc.contributor.authorFaulhaber, Markus
dc.contributor.authorMulla, Sohail M.
dc.contributor.authorMertz, Dominik P.
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorBassler, Dirk
dc.contributor.authorBusse, Jason Walter
dc.contributor.authorMarín, F. J.
dc.contributor.authorLamontagne, Francois C.
dc.contributor.authorNordmann, Alain Joel
dc.contributor.authorGloy, Viktoria Luise
dc.contributor.authorRaatz, Heike D.I.
dc.contributor.authorMoja, Lorenzo P.
dc.contributor.authorRosenthal, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorEbrahim, Shanil
dc.contributor.authorSchandelmaier, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorSun, Xin
dc.contributor.authorVandvik, Per Olav
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Bradley C.
dc.contributor.authorWalter, Martin A.
dc.contributor.authorBurnand, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorSchwenkglenks, Matthias M.
dc.contributor.authorHemkens, Lars G.
dc.contributor.authorBucher, Heíner Claudins C.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Guyatt H.
dc.contributor.authorBriel, Matthias
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:43:00Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:43:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractIMPORTANCE: The discontinuation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) raises ethical concerns and often wastes scarce research resources. The epidemiology of discontinued RCTs, however, remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence, characteristics, and publication history of discontinued RCTs and to investigate factors associated with RCT discontinuation due to poor recruitment and with nonpublication. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort of RCTs based on archived protocols approved by 6 research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003.We recorded trial characteristics and planned recruitment from included protocols. Last follow-up of RCTs was April 27, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Completion status, reported reasons for discontinuation, and publication status of RCTs as determined by correspondence with the research ethics committees, literature searches, and investigator surveys. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.6 years (range, 8.8-12.6 years), 253 of 1017 included RCTs were discontinued (24.9% [95%CI, 22.3%-27.6%]). Only 96 of 253 discontinuations (37.9% [95%CI, 32.0%-44.3%]) were reported to ethics committees. The most frequent reason for discontinuation was poor recruitment (101/1017; 9.9%[95%CI, 8.2%-12.0%]). In multivariable analysis, industry sponsorship vs investigator sponsorship (8.4% vs 26.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.25 [95%CI, 0.15-0.43]; P < .001) and a larger planned sample size in increments of 100 (-0.7%; OR, 0.96 [95%CI, 0.92-1.00]; P = .04) were associated with lower rates of discontinuation due to poor recruitment. Discontinued trials were more likely to remain unpublished than completed trials (55.1% vs 33.6%; OR, 3.19 [95%CI, 2.29-4.43]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this sample of trials based on RCT protocols from 6 research ethics committees, discontinuation was common, with poor recruitment being the most frequently reported reason. Greater efforts are needed to ensure the reporting of trial discontinuation to research ethics committees and the publication of results of discontinued trials. Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.1361
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84896800584
dc.identifier.pmid24618966
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30172
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Association
dc.relation.ispartofJAMA
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCanada
dc.subjectCohort studies
dc.subjectEthics committees, research
dc.subjectGermany
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectOdds ratio
dc.subjectPatient selection
dc.subjectPublication bias
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trials as topic
dc.subjectRetrospective studies
dc.subjectSwitzerland
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectClinical protocol
dc.subjectCohort analysis
dc.subjectData processing
dc.subjectDiscontinued randomized clinical trial
dc.subjectFollow up
dc.subjectHealth care delivery
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPatient compliance
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectPublication
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectResearch ethics
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.titlePrevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2014-10606.pdf
Size:
737.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format