Systematic review and meta-analysis of inhaled toxicants from waterpipe and cigarette smoking

dc.contributor.authorPrimack, Brian A.
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Mary V.
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Patricia M.
dc.contributor.authorShihadeh, Alan Louis
dc.contributor.authorShensa, Ariel
dc.contributor.authorFarley, Steven T.
dc.contributor.authorFine, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorEissenberg, Thomas E.
dc.contributor.authorNayak, Smita
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:32:10Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:32:10Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjective. Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) is an emerging trend worldwide. To inform public health policy and educational programming, we systematically reviewed the biomedical literature to compute the inhaled smoke volume, nicotine, tar, and carbon monoxide (CO) associated with a single WTS session and a single cigarette. Methods. We searched seven biomedical bibliographic databases for controlled laboratory or natural environment studies designed to mimic human tobacco consumption. Included studies quantified the mainstream smoke of a single cigarette and/or single WTS session for smoke volume, nicotine, tar, and/or CO. We conducted meta-analyses to calculate summary estimates for the inhalation of each unique substance for each mode of tobacco consumption. We assessed between-study heterogeneity using chi-squared and I-squared statistics. Results. Sufficient data from 17 studies were available to derive pooled estimates for inhalation of each exposure via each smoking method. Two researchers working independently abstracted measurement of smoke volume in liters, and nicotine, tar, and CO in milligrams. All numbers included in metaanalyses matched precisely between the two researchers (100% agreement, Cohen’s k51.00). Whereas one WTS session was associated with 74.1 liters of smoke inhalation (95% confidence interval [CI] 38.2, 110.0), one cigarette was associated with 0.6 liters of smoke (95% CI 0.5, 0.7). One WTS session was also associated with higher levels of nicotine, tar, and CO. Conclusions. One WTS session consistently exposed users to larger smoke volumes and higher levels of tobacco toxicants compared with one cigarette. These computed estimates may be valuable to emphasize in prevention programming. © 2016 Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/003335491613100114
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84953319605
dc.identifier.pmid26843673
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/27714
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAssociation of Schools of Public Health
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Health Reports
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCarbon monoxide
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInhalation exposure
dc.subjectNicotine
dc.subjectSmoking
dc.subjectTars
dc.subjectCigarette smoke
dc.subjectTar
dc.subjectTobacco smoke
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectTobacco consumption
dc.subjectWaterpipe tobacco smoking
dc.subjectAdverse effects
dc.subjectAnalysis
dc.subjectExposure
dc.subjectMeta analysis
dc.titleSystematic review and meta-analysis of inhaled toxicants from waterpipe and cigarette smoking
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9825.pdf
Size:
249.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format