Effect of active versus passive confinement on seismic response of wide RC columns with lap splices

dc.contributor.authorHarajlí, Mohamed H.
dc.contributor.authorHantouche, Elie G.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:26:51Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:26:51Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThe results of an experimental study on seismic bond strengthening of spliced reinforcement in wide RC columns using external confinement are presented. Two types of confinement techniques were evaluated and compared, as follows: (1) a combination of external carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) jacket and CFRP anchors, and (2) active confinement by means of pretensioned steel anchor rods. The effectiveness of the different strengthening techniques was evaluated by comparing with test results of companion as-built columns, and earthquake-designed columns which were detailed in accordance with the seismic provisions of a national building code. The columns were subjected to a quasi-static cyclic loading, simulating regions of high seismic hazard. In addition to the type of the strengthening system used, the test variables included area and diameter of the column longitudinal reinforcement. The as-built columns suffered bond and load degradation immediately after yielding of the spliced reinforcement. The actively confined specimens developed considerably larger lateral load, drift, and energy dissipation capacities than the as-built specimens, and performed better than the specimens strengthened using a combination of CFRP jacket and CFRP anchors, and even slightly better than the earthquake-designed specimens. A simple approach is presented for designing the strengthening systems required for effective bond strengthening. © 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001196
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84939478940
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/26691
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Structural Engineering (United States)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectActive confinement
dc.subjectAnchor rods
dc.subjectBond strength
dc.subjectConcrete and masonry structures
dc.subjectCyclic load
dc.subjectEarthquake
dc.subjectSeismic strengthening
dc.subjectAnchor bolts
dc.subjectAnchors
dc.subjectBond strength (materials)
dc.subjectBuilding codes
dc.subjectCarbon fiber reinforced plastics
dc.subjectCyclic loads
dc.subjectEnergy dissipation
dc.subjectReinforcement
dc.subjectSeismic response
dc.subjectSteel fibers
dc.subjectStrengthening (metal)
dc.subjectCarbon fiber reinforced polymer
dc.subjectEnergy dissipation capacities
dc.subjectLongitudinal reinforcement
dc.subjectMasonry structures
dc.subjectNational building code
dc.subjectQuasi-static cyclic loadings
dc.subjectStrengthening technique
dc.subjectEarthquakes
dc.titleEffect of active versus passive confinement on seismic response of wide RC columns with lap splices
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015-9995.pdf
Size:
10.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format