Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorBallout, Rami A.
dc.contributor.authorDiab, Batoul
dc.contributor.authorHarb, Alain C.
dc.contributor.authorTarabay, Rami
dc.contributor.authorKhamassi, Selma
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:47:52Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:47:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground: The acquisition of needle-stick injuries (NSI) in a healthcare setting poses an occupational hazard of transmitting blood-borne pathogens from patients to healthcare workers (HCWs). The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence about the efficacy and safety of using safety-engineered intravenous devices and safety-engineered phlebotomy devices by HCWs. Methods: We included randomized and non-randomized studies comparing safety-engineered devices to conventional/standard devices that lack safety features for delivering intravenous injections and/or for blood-withdrawal procedures (phlebotomy). The outcomes of interest included NSI rates, and blood-borne infections rates among HCWs and patients. We conducted an extensive literature search strategy using the OVID interface in October 2013. We followed the standard methods for study selection and data abstraction. When possible, we conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model. We used the GRADE methodology to assess the quality of evidence by outcome. Results: We identified twenty-two eligible studies: Twelve assessed safety-engineered devices for intravenous procedures, five for phlebotomy procedures, and five for both. Twenty-one of those studies were observational while one was a randomized trial. All studies assessed the reduction in NSIs among HCWs. For safety-engineered intravenous devices, the pooled relative risk for NSI per HCW was 0.28 [0.13, 0.59] (moderate quality evidence). The pooled relative risk for NSI per device used or procedure performed was 0.34 [0.08,1.49] (low quality evidence). For safety-engineered phlebotomy devices, the pooled relative risk for NSI per HCW was 0.57 [0.38, 0.84] (moderate quality evidence). The pooled relative risk for NSI per device used or procedure performed was 0.53 [0.43,0.65] (moderate quality evidence). We identified no studies assessing the outcome of blood-borne infections among healthcare workers or patients. Conclusion: There is moderate-quality evidence that the use of safety-engineered devices in intravenous injections and infusions, and phlebotomy (blood-drawing) procedures reduces NSI rates of HCWs. © 2016 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1705-y
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84984706709
dc.identifier.pmid27581947
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30773
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Health Services Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBlood-borne pathogens
dc.subjectHealthcare setting
dc.subjectHealthcare workers
dc.subjectIntravenous
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.subjectNeedle-stick injuries
dc.subjectPhlebotomy
dc.subjectSafety-engineered devices
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectEquipment design
dc.subjectHealth personnel
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInjections, intramuscular
dc.subjectInjections, intravenous
dc.subjectInjections, subcutaneous
dc.subjectNeedlestick injuries
dc.subjectProtective devices
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trials as topic
dc.subjectSafety
dc.subjectBloodborne bacterium
dc.subjectDevices
dc.subjectHealth care personnel
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectIntramuscular drug administration
dc.subjectIntravenous drug administration
dc.subjectMeta analysis
dc.subjectProtective equipment
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectSubcutaneous drug administration
dc.titleUse of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9297.pdf
Size:
2.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format