Are patients with cancer with sepsis and bacteraemia at a higher risk of mortality? A retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a tertiary care centre in Lebanon

dc.contributor.authorAbou Dagher, Gilbert
dc.contributor.authorEl Khuri, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorChehadeh, Ahel Al Hajj
dc.contributor.authorChami, Ali F.
dc.contributor.authorBachir, Rana H.
dc.contributor.authorZebian, Dina
dc.contributor.authorBou Chebl, Ralph
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:41:28Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:41:28Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: Most sepsis studies have looked at the general population. The aim of this study is to report on the characteristics, treatment and hospital mortality of patients with cancer diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Setting: A single-centre retrospective study at a tertiary care centre looking at patients with cancer who presented to our tertiary hospital with sepsis, septic shock or bacteraemia between 2010 and 2015. Participants: 176 patients with cancer were compared with 176 cancer-free controls. Primary and secondary outcomes: The primary outcome of this study was the in hospital mortality in both cohorts. Secondary outcomes included patient demographics, emergency department (ED) vital signs and parameters of resuscitation along with laboratory work. Results: A total of 352 patients were analysed. The mean age at presentation for the cancer group was 65.39±15.04 years, whereas the mean age for the control group was 74.68±14.04 years (p<0.001). In the cancer cohort the respiratory system was the most common site of infection (37.5%) followed by the urinary system (26.7%), while in the cancer-free arm, the urinary system was the most common site of infection (40.9%). intravenous fluid replacement for the first 24 hours was higher in the cancer cohort. ED, intensive care unit and general practice unit length of stay were comparable in both the groups. 95 (54%) patients with cancer died compared with 75 (42.6%) in the cancer-free group. The 28-day hospital mortality in the cancer cohort was 87 (49.4%) vs 46 (26.1%) in the cancer-free cohort (p=0.009). Patients with cancer had a 2.320 (CI 95% 1.225 to 4.395, p=0.010) odds of dying compared with patients without cancer in the setting of sepsis. Conclusions: This is the first study looking at an in-depth analysis of sepsis in the specific oncology population. Despite aggressive care, patients with cancer have higher hospital mortality than their cancer-free counterparts while adjusting for all other variables. © 2017 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013502
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85015322124
dc.identifier.pmid28289047
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/29750
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAccident & emergency medicine
dc.subjectInfectious diseases
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectBacteremia
dc.subjectCritical care
dc.subjectEmergency service, hospital
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFluid therapy
dc.subjectHospital mortality
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIntensive care units
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectLength of stay
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectRespiratory tract infections
dc.subjectRetrospective studies
dc.subjectSepsis
dc.subjectTertiary care centers
dc.subjectUrinary tract infections
dc.subjectInfusion fluid
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDemography
dc.subjectEmergency ward
dc.subjectGeneral practice
dc.subjectHigh risk patient
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectIntensive care unit
dc.subjectLaboratory test
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMalignant neoplasm
dc.subjectMedical record review
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectRespiratory tract infection
dc.subjectResuscitation
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSeptic shock
dc.subjectTertiary care center
dc.subjectTreatment planning
dc.subjectUrinary tract infection
dc.subjectVital sign
dc.subjectComplication
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHospital emergency service
dc.subjectIntensive care
dc.subjectMortality
dc.subjectNeoplasm
dc.subjectVery elderly
dc.titleAre patients with cancer with sepsis and bacteraemia at a higher risk of mortality? A retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a tertiary care centre in Lebanon
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-9019.pdf
Size:
723.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format