Risk adapted therapeutic strategy in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: Refining the outcomes of ELN 2017 intermediate-risk patients
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Abstract
Introduction: Despite advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the standard induction regimen. Patients and methods: In this single center retrospective study, we assessed outcomes of 99 consecutive adult AML patients treated with a risk-adapted strategy with a median follow-up of 35.5 months. Results: We identified 24 (24 %), 55 (56 %) and 20 (20 %) patients classified as favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse- risk group respectively, according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 classification. Patients either received idarubicin and cytarabine induction chemotherapy with or without FLT3 inhibitors or hypomethylating agents based on age and comorbidity. The complete response (CR) rate was 76 % (82 % and 61 % in patients aged < 60 and ≥ 60, respectively). For the whole cohort, the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 53 %, being 62 % and 30 % in patients aged < 60 and ≥ 60, respectively. The 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 54 %, with 56 % and 45 % in patients aged < 60 and ≥ 60, respectively. The 3-year LFS were 58 %, 62 % and 25 % for patients within ELN favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk groups respectively. Twenty-seven (36 %) out of 75 patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk disease underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first CR with 92 % of them receiving post-transplant maintenance consisting of azacitidine in 19 (76 %) patients or sorafenib in 6 (24 %) patients. Of these patients younger than 60 years, the 3-year OS and LFS were 85 % and 69 %, respectively. Conclusion: These results indicate an improved OS for AML patients especially in intermediate-risk category who were treated with a total therapy consisting of induction chemotherapy followed by allo-HCT and post-transplant maintenance. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Description
Keywords
Aml, Eln classification, Induction chemotherapy, Post-transplant maintenance, Transplant, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols, Female, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Humans, Leukemia, myeloid, acute, Maintenance chemotherapy, Male, Middle aged, Retrospective studies, Risk factors, Transplantation, homologous, Treatment outcome, Young adult, Azacitidine, Cyclophosphamide, Cyclosporine, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin, Decitabine, Fludarabine, Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, Hydroxyurea, Idarubicin, Methotrexate, Mycophenolate mofetil, Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor, Sorafenib, Antineoplastic agent, Acute myeloid leukemia, Age distribution, Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Article, Cancer specific survival, Cohort analysis, Comorbidity, Consolidation chemotherapy, Continuous infusion, Controlled study, Follow up, Graft versus host reaction, High risk population, Human, Intermediate risk patient, Intermediate risk population, Leukemia remission, Major clinical study, Outcome assessment, Overall survival, Priority journal, Retrospective study, Risk assessment, Survival time, Treatment duration, Treatment response, Allotransplantation, Classification, Procedures, Risk factor, Very elderly