Adjustable Gastric Banding Conversion to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Data Analysis of a Multicenter Database
| dc.contributor.author | Pujol-Rafols, Juan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Uyanik, Ozlem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Curbelo-Peña, Yuhamy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abbas, Amr Al | |
| dc.contributor.author | Devriendt, Stefanie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guerra, Anabela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Herrera, Miguel Francisco | |
| dc.contributor.author | Himpens, Jacques M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pardina, Eva | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pouwels, Sjaak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramos, Almino Cardoso | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ribeiro, Rui José Da Silva | |
| dc.contributor.author | Safadi, Bassem Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sánchez-Aguilar, Hugo A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Vries, Claire E.E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | van Wagensveld, Bart Alexander | |
| dc.contributor.department | Surgery | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T12:14:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T12:14:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been proposed as a rescue technique for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) poor responders. Aim: We sought to analyze, complications, mortality, and medium-term weight loss results after LAGB conversion to OAGB. Methods: Data analysis of an international multicenter database. Results: One hundred eighty-nine LAGB-to-OAGB operations were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty-seven (46.0%) were converted in one stage. Patients operated on in two stages had a higher preoperative body mass index (BMI) (37.9 vs. 41.3 kg/m2, p = 0.0007) and were more likely to have encountered technical complications, such as slippage or erosions (36% vs. 78%, p < 0.0001). Postoperative complications occurred in 4.8% of the patients (4.6% and 4.9% in the one-stage and the two-stage group, respectively). Leak rate, bleeding episodes, and mortality were 2.6%, 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively. The final BMI was 30.2 at a mean follow-up of 31.4 months. Follow-up at 1, 3, and 5 years was 100%, 88%, and 70%, respectively. Conclusion: Conversion from LAGB to OAGB is safe and effective. The one-stage approach appears to be the preferred option in non-complicate cases, while the two-step approach is mostly done for more complicated cases. © 2022, The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05277-1 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85125391384 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35230640 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/33163 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Conversion | |
| dc.subject | Gastric banding | |
| dc.subject | Lagb | |
| dc.subject | Oagb | |
| dc.subject | One anastomosis gastric bypass | |
| dc.subject | Revision | |
| dc.subject | Revisional surgery | |
| dc.subject | Data analysis | |
| dc.subject | Gastric bypass | |
| dc.subject | Gastroplasty | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Laparoscopy | |
| dc.subject | Obesity, morbid | |
| dc.subject | Postoperative complications | |
| dc.subject | Reoperation | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective studies | |
| dc.subject | Treatment outcome | |
| dc.subject | Adverse event | |
| dc.subject | Clinical trial | |
| dc.subject | Complication | |
| dc.subject | Gastric bypass surgery | |
| dc.subject | Human | |
| dc.subject | Morbid obesity | |
| dc.subject | Multicenter study | |
| dc.subject | Postoperative complication | |
| dc.subject | Procedures | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective study | |
| dc.title | Adjustable Gastric Banding Conversion to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Data Analysis of a Multicenter Database | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1