Adjustable Gastric Banding Conversion to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Data Analysis of a Multicenter Database

dc.contributor.authorPujol-Rafols, Juan
dc.contributor.authorUyanik, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorCurbelo-Peña, Yuhamy
dc.contributor.authorAbbas, Amr Al
dc.contributor.authorDevriendt, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Anabela
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, Miguel Francisco
dc.contributor.authorHimpens, Jacques M.
dc.contributor.authorPardina, Eva
dc.contributor.authorPouwels, Sjaak
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Almino Cardoso
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Rui José Da Silva
dc.contributor.authorSafadi, Bassem Y.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Aguilar, Hugo A.
dc.contributor.authorde Vries, Claire E.E.
dc.contributor.authorvan Wagensveld, Bart Alexander
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:14:15Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:14:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been proposed as a rescue technique for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) poor responders. Aim: We sought to analyze, complications, mortality, and medium-term weight loss results after LAGB conversion to OAGB. Methods: Data analysis of an international multicenter database. Results: One hundred eighty-nine LAGB-to-OAGB operations were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty-seven (46.0%) were converted in one stage. Patients operated on in two stages had a higher preoperative body mass index (BMI) (37.9 vs. 41.3 kg/m2, p = 0.0007) and were more likely to have encountered technical complications, such as slippage or erosions (36% vs. 78%, p < 0.0001). Postoperative complications occurred in 4.8% of the patients (4.6% and 4.9% in the one-stage and the two-stage group, respectively). Leak rate, bleeding episodes, and mortality were 2.6%, 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively. The final BMI was 30.2 at a mean follow-up of 31.4 months. Follow-up at 1, 3, and 5 years was 100%, 88%, and 70%, respectively. Conclusion: Conversion from LAGB to OAGB is safe and effective. The one-stage approach appears to be the preferred option in non-complicate cases, while the two-step approach is mostly done for more complicated cases. © 2022, The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05277-1
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85125391384
dc.identifier.pmid35230640
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/33163
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectConversion
dc.subjectGastric banding
dc.subjectLagb
dc.subjectOagb
dc.subjectOne anastomosis gastric bypass
dc.subjectRevision
dc.subjectRevisional surgery
dc.subjectData analysis
dc.subjectGastric bypass
dc.subjectGastroplasty
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subjectObesity, morbid
dc.subjectPostoperative complications
dc.subjectReoperation
dc.subjectRetrospective studies
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectAdverse event
dc.subjectClinical trial
dc.subjectComplication
dc.subjectGastric bypass surgery
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMorbid obesity
dc.subjectMulticenter study
dc.subjectPostoperative complication
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.titleAdjustable Gastric Banding Conversion to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Data Analysis of a Multicenter Database
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-1798.pdf
Size:
758.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections