Efficacy and safety of liraglutide compared to sulphonylurea during Ramadan in patients with type 2 diabetes (LIRA-Ramadan): a randomized trial

dc.contributor.authorAzar, Sami T.
dc.contributor.authorEchtay, Akram Salim
dc.contributor.authorWan Bebakar, Wan Mohamad
dc.contributor.authorAl Araj, S.
dc.contributor.authorBerrah, Abdelkrim
dc.contributor.authorOmar, Mahomed Abdool Khalek
dc.contributor.authorMutha, Abhay
dc.contributor.authorTornøe, Karen
dc.contributor.authorKaltoft, Margit Staum
dc.contributor.authorShehadeh, Naim N.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:47:51Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:47:51Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractAims: Compare effects of liraglutide 1.8 mg and sulphonylurea, both combined with metformin, on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) fasting during Ramadan. Materials and methods: In this up to 33-week, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group trial, adults [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7%-10% (53-86 mmol/mol); body mass index ≥20 kg/m2; intent to fast] were randomized (1:1) ≥10 weeks before Ramadan to either switch to once-daily liraglutide (final dose 1.8 mg) or continue pre-trial sulphonylurea at maximum tolerated dose, both with metformin. Primary endpoint: change in fructosamine, a validated marker of short-term glycaemic control, during Ramadan. Results: Similar reductions in fructosamine levels were observed for both groups during Ramadan [liraglutide (−12.8 µmol/L); sulphonylurea (−16.4 µmol/L); estimated treatment difference (ETD) 3.51 µmol/L (95% CI: −5.26; 12.28); p = 0.43], despite lower fructosamine levels in the liraglutide group at start of Ramadan. Fewer documented symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were reported in liraglutide-treated (2%, three subjects) versus sulphonylurea-treated patients (11%, 18 subjects). No severe hypoglycaemic episodes were reported by either group. Body weight decreased more during Ramadan with liraglutide (ETD: −0.54 kg; 95% CI: −0.94;−0.14; p = 0.0091). The proportion of patients reporting adverse events was similar between groups. Liraglutide led to greater HbA1c reduction [ETD: −0.59% (−6.40 mmol/mol), 95% CI: −0.79; −0.38%; −8.63; −4.17 mmol/mol; p < 0.0001]. Conclusions: Despite lower fructosamine levels and body weight at the beginning of Ramadan, use of liraglutide showed similar glycaemic improvements, fewer hypoglycaemic episodes and greater body weight reduction compared with sulphonylurea. LIRA-Ramadan provides evidence for liraglutide being safe and efficacious for management of T2D during Ramadan fasting. © 2016 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/dom.12733
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84982214208
dc.identifier.pmid27376711
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30772
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBody weight
dc.subjectFasting
dc.subjectFructosamine
dc.subjectGlp-1
dc.subjectHypoglycaemia
dc.subjectLiraglutide
dc.subjectMetformin
dc.subjectRamadan
dc.subjectSulphonylurea
dc.subjectType 2 diabetes
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus, type 2
dc.subjectDrug substitution
dc.subjectDrug therapy, combination
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHypoglycemic agents
dc.subjectIslam
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectSulfonylurea compounds
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectGlibenclamide
dc.subjectGliclazide
dc.subjectGlimepiride
dc.subjectGlipizide
dc.subjectGlucose
dc.subjectHemoglobin a1c
dc.subjectSulfonylurea
dc.subjectAntidiabetic agent
dc.subjectSulfonylurea derivative
dc.subjectAbscess
dc.subjectAcute pancreatitis
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBody mass
dc.subjectChronic pancreatitis
dc.subjectComparative effectiveness
dc.subjectConstipation
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDiarrhea
dc.subjectDiet restriction
dc.subjectDisease severity
dc.subjectDrug dose escalation
dc.subjectDrug efficacy
dc.subjectDrug fatality
dc.subjectDrug safety
dc.subjectDrug tolerability
dc.subjectDrug withdrawal
dc.subjectFructosamine blood level
dc.subjectGastroenteritis
dc.subjectGastrointestinal symptom
dc.subjectGlucose blood level
dc.subjectGlycemic control
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHypoglycemia
dc.subjectInfection
dc.subjectInfestation
dc.subjectMaximum tolerated dose
dc.subjectMulticenter study
dc.subjectNausea
dc.subjectNocturnal hypoglycemia
dc.subjectNon insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
dc.subjectOpen study
dc.subjectParallel design
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectSide effect
dc.subjectVomiting
dc.subjectWeight reduction
dc.subjectBlood
dc.subjectClinical trial
dc.subjectCombination drug therapy
dc.subjectMetabolism
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of liraglutide compared to sulphonylurea during Ramadan in patients with type 2 diabetes (LIRA-Ramadan): a randomized trial
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9343.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format