Bi-objective optimization of retailer’s profit and customer surplus in assortment and pricing planning
| dc.contributor.author | Maddah, Bacel S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ben Abdelaziz, Fouad | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tarhini, Hussein | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Industrial Engineering and Management | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T11:31:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T11:31:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | We develop a bi-objective optimization for a retailer product line, composed of substitutable variants, that seeks to maximize the retailer’s profit and consumer surplus concurrently, where the surplus is measured as a utility scaled in dollars. With fast-moving consumer goods in mind, we utilize a deterministic, price-dependent, utility model to develop the demand function. The problem is then formulated as a bi-objective mixed-integer nonlinear program. The ε-constraint method is used to fully develop the set of Pareto optimal solutions for this problem. Specifically, we derive analytical bounds on the values of ε that lead to Pareto optimal solutions. We then propose a scheme with simple steps that allows developing as many efficient solutions, as needed. To overcome the computational burden, we adopt a linearization scheme, which recast the problem into an integer-linear program that proves to be solvable within couple CPU seconds for large, industry-size, instances with tens of products and numerous consumer segments. Numerical examples on small- and large-size instances indicate that providing the customer with a high surplus level typically requires low prices and, surprisingly, small assortments (to reduce fixed costs). Another counter-intuitive observation that we make is that the price of a product sometimes raises when the required customer surplus level in the market is increased. This is due to cannibalization among products and change in the optimal assortment structure. © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03265-4 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85065654156 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/27603 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Operations Research | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Assortment planning | |
| dc.subject | Multi-objective optimization | |
| dc.subject | Pricing | |
| dc.subject | Retail management | |
| dc.subject | Ε-constraint method | |
| dc.title | Bi-objective optimization of retailer’s profit and customer surplus in assortment and pricing planning | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1