Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Trans-urethral Resection of the Prostate, Laser Vaporization, and Laser Enucleation: A Double Propensity Score Matched Analysis

dc.contributor.authorAyoub, Christian Habib
dc.contributor.authorHaber, Rachelle
dc.contributor.authorAmine, Reem
dc.contributor.authorMikati, Diana
dc.contributor.authorMahfoud, Ziyad R.
dc.contributor.authorEl Hajj, Albert Elias
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmology
dc.contributor.departmentSpecialized Clinical Programs and Services
dc.contributor.departmentSalim El-Hoss Bioethics and Professionalism Program (SHBPP)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:14:26Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare postoperative outcomes of 3 types of endourologic surgeries (trans-urethral resection of the prostate [TURP], laser vaporization [LVP], and laser enucleation [LEP]) for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) treatment using the ACS-NSQIP database. Methods: The ACS-NSQIP database was queried for men who underwent TURP, PVP, and LEP for treatment of BPH from 2011 till 2019. Demographics, clinical, operative characteristics, and 30-day outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate regression models were constructed. Propensity score matching was then performed as a sensitivity analysis. Results: A total of 74,273 patients underwent endourologic surgeries for BPH, 65.4% had TURP, 28.6% PVP, and 5.9% LEP. Patients undergoing TURP were more likely to be older with higher ASA class, abnormal labs, and comorbidities (diabetic, congestive heart failure, and bleeding requiring transfusion) (P-value <.001). After adjusting for covariates and propensity score matching, LVP demonstrated shorter hospital stays, shorter operative times, less reoperation rates, decreased DVT/PE risk, with, however, higher odds of urinary tract infection and sepsis as compared to TURP (P-value<.028). Furthermore, LEP was found to have shorter hospital stays, longer operative times, and decreased odds of urinary tract infections and sepsis as compared to TURP (P-value<.006). Conclusion: LVP and LEP showed better surgical outcomes and characteristics as compared to TURP. Further research is needed to account for longer duration of follow-up and patient-specific urologic outcomes, such as prostate size, urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and retrograde ejaculation. © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.004
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85161083951
dc.identifier.pmid37182649
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/33187
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofUrology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAbnormal value
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectClinical feature
dc.subjectComorbidity
dc.subjectComparative effectiveness
dc.subjectCongestive heart failure
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDeep vein thrombosis
dc.subjectDemography
dc.subjectDiabetic patient
dc.subjectDisease classification
dc.subjectHospitalization
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectLaser enucleation of the prostate
dc.subjectLaser vaporization
dc.subjectLung embolism
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectOperation duration
dc.subjectPostoperative hemorrhage
dc.subjectPostoperative period
dc.subjectPropensity score
dc.subjectProstate hypertrophy
dc.subjectReoperation
dc.subjectSensitivity analysis
dc.subjectSepsis
dc.subjectSurgical risk
dc.subjectTransurethral resection
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectUrinary tract infection
dc.subjectVery elderly
dc.titleComparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Trans-urethral Resection of the Prostate, Laser Vaporization, and Laser Enucleation: A Double Propensity Score Matched Analysis
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-620.pdf
Size:
404.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format