The Radboud dysarthria assessment: validity and reliability of the Arabic version

dc.contributor.authorSummaka, Marwa
dc.contributor.authorNasser, Zeina
dc.contributor.authorHannoun, S.
dc.contributor.authorDaoud, Rama
dc.contributor.authorZein, Hiba
dc.contributor.authorAl-Thalaya, Zahra
dc.contributor.authorHamadeh, Zainab A.
dc.contributor.authorKoubaisy, Nour
dc.contributor.authorJebahi, Fatima
dc.contributor.authorNaim, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorHarati, Hayat
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Health Professions
dc.contributor.departmentMedical Imaging Sciences
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:19:45Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:19:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Radboud Dysarthria Assessment (RDA) and the speech component of the Radboud Oral Motor inventory for Parkinson’s disease (ROMP-speech) into the Arabic language among Lebanese subjects with dysarthria. Materials and methods: This study included 50 participants with dysarthria. The Arabic versions of the RDA (A-RDA) and the ROMP-speech (A-ROMP-speech) were administered in addition to the Arabic Speech Intelligibility test, the Lebanese Voice Handicap Index–10 (VHI-10lb) and semantic verbal fluency tasks. The maximum performance tasks were analyzed using the Praat software. The A-RDA qualitative recording form and the A-ROMP-speech were assessed for construct validity and internal consistency. The convergent validity of the maximum performance tasks, the severity scale, and the A-ROMP-speech were evaluated. Results: Exploratory factor analysis of the qualitative recording form extracted 3 factors explaining 82.973% of the total variance, and it demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.912). The maximum performance tasks of the RDA correlated significantly with the corresponding Praat scores. The severity scale and the A-ROMP-speech correlated fairly to strongly with the Arabic Speech Intelligibility test (rs=-0.695 and −0.736, p < 0.001) and the VHI-10lb (r = 0.539 and 0.640, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The A-RDA and the A-ROMP-speech are valid and reliable dysarthria tools among Lebanese subjects. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2297809
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85180846105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/34190
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofDisability and Rehabilitation
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectArabic
dc.subjectClinimetrics
dc.subjectCross-cultural adaptation
dc.subjectDysarthria
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectValidation
dc.titleThe Radboud dysarthria assessment: validity and reliability of the Arabic version
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-1100.pdf
Size:
1.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format