Diabetes quality of care at a university community in Beirut

dc.contributor.authorLakkis, Najla A.
dc.contributor.authorMahmassani, Dina M.
dc.contributor.authorHamadeh, Ghassan N.
dc.contributor.departmentFamily Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:42:19Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:42:19Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractRationale, aims and objectives To assess the quality of diabetes mellitus (DM) care provided by a group of family doctors in Beirut. Methods An observational study, conducted at the American University of Beirut Medical Center-Family Medicine Clinics (AUBMC-FMC), examined the electronic health records (EHRs) of the beneficiaries of the Health Insurance Plan at the American University of Beirut (AUB-HIP) who were older than 20 years (n = 9469) in 2009. The eligible population included patients with DM (n = 701). Several provider/patient-directed interventions were introduced in the late 2000s, including a comprehensive EHRs system with point-of-care computer reminders, a provider financial incentive based on an annual performance appraisal ranked against that of the US Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Comprehensive Diabetes Care indicators, as well as periodic up-to-date training. Results Optimal control for HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure were found in 58.6%, 51.0%, 22.4%, 53.3% and 60.2% of the population, respectively. 64.1% and 70.0% received screening for diabetic nephropathy and a dilated eye examination, respectively. When benchmarked against the HEDIS Comprehensive Diabetes Care indicators, the AUB-HIP's quality of care was 13% higher than the average of all plans in the United States. Screening for nephropathy, however, did not reach the above benchmark. Conclusions Benchmarking served as an important tool in evaluating the current DM care offered and in detecting gaps, yet interventions are recommended for further improvement. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12386
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84944167687
dc.identifier.pmid25989065
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/29953
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBenchmarking
dc.subjectDiabetes
dc.subjectElectronic health records
dc.subjectMedical informatics
dc.subjectPatient-centred care
dc.subjectPrimary health care
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAmbulatory care facilities
dc.subjectBlood pressure
dc.subjectDiabetes complications
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHemoglobin a, glycosylated
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInservice training
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectLipids
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectQuality of health care
dc.subjectReimbursement, incentive
dc.subjectReminder systems
dc.subjectHemoglobin a1c
dc.subjectHigh density lipoprotein cholesterol
dc.subjectLow density lipoprotein cholesterol
dc.subjectTriacylglycerol
dc.subjectGlycosylated hemoglobin
dc.subjectLipid
dc.subjectAlbuminuria
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBody weight
dc.subjectCholesterol blood level
dc.subjectComorbidity
dc.subjectDiabetes control
dc.subjectDiabetic nephropathy
dc.subjectEye examination
dc.subjectHealth care quality
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectNon insulin dependent diabetes mellitus
dc.subjectObservational study
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectProtocol compliance
dc.subjectScreening test
dc.subjectUniversity hospital
dc.subjectBlood
dc.subjectElectronic health record
dc.subjectIn service training
dc.subjectOutpatient department
dc.subjectQuality control
dc.subjectReimbursement
dc.subjectReminder system
dc.subjectStatistics and numerical data
dc.subjectVery elderly
dc.titleDiabetes quality of care at a university community in Beirut
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015-5031.pdf
Size:
125.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections