The design and testing of shields to reduce spray drift

dc.contributor.authorAwadallah, Hani Hassan Osman
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Soils, Irrigation, and Mechanization
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date2001
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-13T06:47:52Z
dc.date.available2012-06-13T06:47:52Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.)--American University of Beirut. Department of Soils, Irrigation and Mechanization, 2001; Advisor : Dr. Moatasim Sidahmed, Associate Professor Soils, Irrigation and Mechanization--Member of Committee :Dr lsam Bashour, Associate Professor, Soils, Irrigation and Mechanization--Member of Committee: Dr Mohamad-Ragy Darwish, Assistant Professor, Soils, Irrigation and Mechanization
dc.descriptionBibliography : leaves 78-80
dc.description.abstractDrift, which is defined as the movement of chemical away from the intended target, is one of the major concerns in pesticide spraying, causing environmental pollution and economical losses. One of the major factors influencing drift is wind. Mechanical shields have been used as a method to reduce drift by deflecting wind away from the spray. In this study mechanical shields for minimizing spray drift were designed, developed and tested in a wind tunnel. Two different designs were considered and their performances were compared with the shield designed by Ozkan et al. (1997)--Each shield was tested using two standard flat fan nozzles (8001 and 8003), operated at three levels of pressure (138, 276 and 414 kPa) Test for no shield and no wind conditions were also conducted to represent zero drift condition. The average wind tunnel air velocity was 6.2 m/s. A three dimensional patternator (1.3 m x 1.0 m x 0,15 m) was used to measure the amount of spray recovery under each treatment. Percent spray drift and distance of center of mass from nozzle axis were used as criterions to compare the performances of the shields. Data was analyzed using a completely randomized design, and means separation was performed using Duncan's Multiple Range Test at 0.05 level of significance A symmetrical triple circular shield had the best performance compared to the other shields due to its aerodynamic features, which provided natural air assist as well as an air curtain in front of the discharge with partial shielding of the portion part of the nozzle. Results showed that shields are more efficient in reducing drift using the 8001 nozzle. The DL and percent drift values were not significantly consistent.
dc.format.extentxiii, 80 leaves : ill., tables
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/6052
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofTheses, Dissertations, and Projects
dc.subject.classificationST:004126 AUBNO
dc.subject.lcshShields -- Design
dc.subject.lcshShields -- Testing
dc.titleThe design and testing of shields to reduce spray drift
dc.typeThesis

Files