An Analysis of Ghana’s National ICT Policy in Education
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This study offers a comprehensive analysis of Ghana’s National Implementation Guidelines for ICT in Education using Walt and Gilson’s Policy Triangle Framework (context, content, actors, process). Motivated by Ghana’s repeated policy reforms and the urgent need to translate policy ambition into classroom practice, the research synthesises national strategies, official guidelines, and recent empirical literature (2018–2025) to identify why implementation gaps persist despite pronounced political commitment. Employing qualitative document analysis, the study interrogates how socio-economic factors, institutional arrangements, and stakeholder dynamics shape the translation of policy into practice. Findings show that the guidelines articulate clear objectives – including curriculum integration, teacher competency development, infrastructure provision, and monitoring mechanisms – and align with the 2018-2030 Education Strategic Plan and SDG targets. However, the policy’s execution is undermined by chronic funding shortfalls, heavy reliance on donor-funded pilots, uneven infrastructure (notably electricity and connectivity), and limited technical and pedagogical capacity among many teachers. Actor analysis reveals a complex multi-agency landscape (MoE, GES, NaCCA, NaSIA, NCA, GIFEC, CENDLOS and development partners such as UNESCO and the World Bank) where coordination remains weak; frontline implementers and communities frequently lack meaningful voice in design and feedback loops. Process analysis highlights a largely top-down adoption approach, ambitious national benchmarks, and phased rollouts that often fail to account for rural–urban disparities, resulting in uneven uptake and frequent underuse of supplied hardware. The study concludes that achieving transformative and equitable ICT integration requires stronger alignment of policy content with contextual realities: sustained domestic financing and maintenance plans, targeted investments in teacher digital pedagogy and local IT support, robust M&E systems with public indicators, and deliberate equity measures prioritising rural and marginalised schools. Practical recommendations include institutionalising ICT budgets, formalising PPPs with clear sustainability clauses, embedding ICT competencies within teacher accreditation, and creating participatory feedback channels for schools and communities. By applying the Policy Triangle, this paper contributes both a diagnostic account of Ghana’s ICT-in-education experience and a set of actionable reforms aimed at converting policy intent into inclusive, sustainable classroom practice.
Description
Project. M.A. American University of Beirut. Department of Education, 2025.