Guidelines 2.0: Systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise

dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.authorWiercioch, Wojtek
dc.contributor.authorEtxeandia Ikobaltzeta, Itziar
dc.contributor.authorFalavigna, Maicon
dc.contributor.authorSantesso, Nancy A.
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Reem A.
dc.contributor.authorVentresca, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorBrignardello-Petersen, Romina
dc.contributor.authorLaisaar, Kaja Triin
dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Sérgio Cândido
dc.contributor.authorBaldeh, Tejan
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yuan
dc.contributor.authorRaid, Ulla
dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Susan L.
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Judith
dc.contributor.authorHarbour, Robin T.
dc.contributor.authorTreweek, Shaun P.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Guyatt H.
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorReinap, Marge
dc.contributor.authorBrožek, Jan L.
dc.contributor.authorOxman, Andrew David
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:42:55Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:42:55Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although several tools to evaluate the credibility of health care guidelines exist, guidance on practical steps for developing guidelines is lacking. We systematically compiled a comprehensive checklist of items linked to relevant resources and tools that guideline developers could consider, without the expectation that every guideline would address each item. Methods: We searched data sources, including manuals of international guideline developers, literature on guidelines for guidelines (with a focus on methodology reports from international and national agencies, and professional societies) and recent articles providing systematic guidance. We reviewed these sources in duplicate, extracted items for the checklist using a sensitive approach and developed overarching topics relevant to guidelines. In an iterative process, we reviewed items for duplication and omissions and involved experts in guideline development for revisions and suggestions for items to be added. Results: We developed a checklist with 18 topics and 146 items and a webpage to facilitate its use by guideline developers. The topics and included items cover all stages of the guideline enterprise, from the planning and formulation of guidelines, to their implementation and evaluation. The final checklist includes links to training materials as well as resources with suggested methodology for applying the items. Interpretation: The checklist will serve as a resource for guideline developers. Consideration of items on the checklist will support the development, implementation and evaluation of guidelines. We will use crowdsourcing to revise the checklist and keep it up to date. © 2014 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.131237
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84894232568
dc.identifier.pmid24344144
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30136
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCanadian Medical Association
dc.relation.ispartofCMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectData collection
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicine
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPractice guidelines as topic
dc.subjectStatistics as topic
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectClinical practice
dc.subjectCrowdsourcing
dc.subjectGuideline development
dc.subjectHealth care planning
dc.subjectMedical society
dc.subjectMethodology
dc.subjectPractice guideline
dc.titleGuidelines 2.0: Systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise
dc.typeArticle

Files