Efficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial
| dc.contributor.author | el-Taha, Lina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abu-Musa, Antoine A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khalifeh, Dalia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khalil, Ali M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abbasi, Sehrish A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nassif, Joseph A. | |
| dc.contributor.department | Obstetrics and Gynecology | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T12:08:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T12:08:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the efficacy of dienogest with the combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) Yasmin for the control of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Study design: Seventy women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea or both for >6 months were randomized to either dienogest (Visanne) 2 mg/day or monophasic COC (Yasmin, 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone) for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was change in non-cyclic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea from baseline to end of treatment, assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary efficacy variable was change in the Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) scale scores for chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire at baseline and 24 weeks. Safety variables included incidence of side-effects, bleeding pattern and treatment tolerability. Results: Both treatments improved the mean VAS score for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain significantly: mean difference 6.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9–7.1; p < 0.0001] in the dienogest group and 4.54 (95% CI 3.1–5.9; p < 0.0001) in the COC group; the difference between them was not significant (p = 0.111). Similarly, both dienogest and COC improved HRQoL in various core and modular segments of the EHP-30 questionnaire with comparable requirements for supplemental pain medication (p = 0.782 and 0.258 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively), and redistribution of the B&B severity profile for chronic pelvic pain (p = 0.052 and 0.526 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively), dysmenorrhoea (p = 0.521 and 1 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively) and dyspareunia (p = 0.376 and 0.835, respectively). Nevertheless, dienogest was associated with fewer side-effects, and hence had a better safety and tolerability profile than COC. Conclusions: Dienogest (2 mg/day) is comparable to the COC Yasmin for the relief of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain and improvement in HRQoL. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT04256200; date of registration 15/1/2020 (registered retrospectively). © 2021 Elsevier B.V. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.029 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85119611776 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 34826668 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/31727 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ireland Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Combined oral contraceptives | |
| dc.subject | Dienogest | |
| dc.subject | Dysmenorrhoea | |
| dc.subject | Endometriosis | |
| dc.subject | Pelvic pain | |
| dc.subject | Contraceptives, oral, combined | |
| dc.subject | Female | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Nandrolone | |
| dc.subject | Quality of life | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective studies | |
| dc.subject | Drospirenone plus ethinylestradiol | |
| dc.subject | Ibuprofen | |
| dc.subject | Oral contraceptive agent | |
| dc.subject | Abdominal discomfort | |
| dc.subject | Adult | |
| dc.subject | Analgesia | |
| dc.subject | Article | |
| dc.subject | Bloating | |
| dc.subject | Body weight gain | |
| dc.subject | Breast tenderness | |
| dc.subject | Controlled study | |
| dc.subject | Disease association | |
| dc.subject | Double blind procedure | |
| dc.subject | Drug efficacy | |
| dc.subject | Drug induced headache | |
| dc.subject | Drug safety | |
| dc.subject | Drug tolerability | |
| dc.subject | Dysmenorrhea | |
| dc.subject | Dyspareunia | |
| dc.subject | Endometriosis health profile 30 questionnaire | |
| dc.subject | Fatigue | |
| dc.subject | Genital system disease assessment | |
| dc.subject | Human | |
| dc.subject | Libido disorder | |
| dc.subject | Low drug dose | |
| dc.subject | Major clinical study | |
| dc.subject | Mastalgia | |
| dc.subject | Mood disorder | |
| dc.subject | Nausea | |
| dc.subject | Pelvis pain syndrome | |
| dc.subject | Randomized controlled trial | |
| dc.subject | Side effect | |
| dc.subject | Sleep disorder | |
| dc.subject | Uterus bleeding | |
| dc.subject | Visual analog scale | |
| dc.subject | Vomiting | |
| dc.subject | Complication | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective study | |
| dc.title | Efficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1