Efficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial

dc.contributor.authorel-Taha, Lina
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Musa, Antoine A.
dc.contributor.authorKhalifeh, Dalia
dc.contributor.authorKhalil, Ali M.
dc.contributor.authorAbbasi, Sehrish A.
dc.contributor.authorNassif, Joseph A.
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:08:08Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:08:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the efficacy of dienogest with the combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) Yasmin for the control of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Study design: Seventy women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea or both for >6 months were randomized to either dienogest (Visanne) 2 mg/day or monophasic COC (Yasmin, 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone) for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was change in non-cyclic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhoea from baseline to end of treatment, assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary efficacy variable was change in the Biberoglu and Behrman (B&B) scale scores for chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated using the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire at baseline and 24 weeks. Safety variables included incidence of side-effects, bleeding pattern and treatment tolerability. Results: Both treatments improved the mean VAS score for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain significantly: mean difference 6.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9–7.1; p < 0.0001] in the dienogest group and 4.54 (95% CI 3.1–5.9; p < 0.0001) in the COC group; the difference between them was not significant (p = 0.111). Similarly, both dienogest and COC improved HRQoL in various core and modular segments of the EHP-30 questionnaire with comparable requirements for supplemental pain medication (p = 0.782 and 0.258 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively), and redistribution of the B&B severity profile for chronic pelvic pain (p = 0.052 and 0.526 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively), dysmenorrhoea (p = 0.521 and 1 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively) and dyspareunia (p = 0.376 and 0.835, respectively). Nevertheless, dienogest was associated with fewer side-effects, and hence had a better safety and tolerability profile than COC. Conclusions: Dienogest (2 mg/day) is comparable to the COC Yasmin for the relief of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain and improvement in HRQoL. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT04256200; date of registration 15/1/2020 (registered retrospectively). © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.029
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85119611776
dc.identifier.pmid34826668
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31727
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCombined oral contraceptives
dc.subjectDienogest
dc.subjectDysmenorrhoea
dc.subjectEndometriosis
dc.subjectPelvic pain
dc.subjectContraceptives, oral, combined
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNandrolone
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectRetrospective studies
dc.subjectDrospirenone plus ethinylestradiol
dc.subjectIbuprofen
dc.subjectOral contraceptive agent
dc.subjectAbdominal discomfort
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAnalgesia
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBloating
dc.subjectBody weight gain
dc.subjectBreast tenderness
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDisease association
dc.subjectDouble blind procedure
dc.subjectDrug efficacy
dc.subjectDrug induced headache
dc.subjectDrug safety
dc.subjectDrug tolerability
dc.subjectDysmenorrhea
dc.subjectDyspareunia
dc.subjectEndometriosis health profile 30 questionnaire
dc.subjectFatigue
dc.subjectGenital system disease assessment
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectLibido disorder
dc.subjectLow drug dose
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMastalgia
dc.subjectMood disorder
dc.subjectNausea
dc.subjectPelvis pain syndrome
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectSide effect
dc.subjectSleep disorder
dc.subjectUterus bleeding
dc.subjectVisual analog scale
dc.subjectVomiting
dc.subjectComplication
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.titleEfficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021-2233.pdf
Size:
861.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format