Review and update on the use of the microanastomotic coupler device for arterial anastomosis in free tissue transfer

dc.contributor.authorEl Baba, Bassel
dc.contributor.authorWatfa, William
dc.contributor.authorYoussef, Lara
dc.contributor.authorDi Summa, Pietro Giovanni D.I.
dc.contributor.authorBou-Khalil, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorJurjus, Abdo R.
dc.contributor.authorLoyens, D. B.
dc.contributor.authorSertel, S.
dc.contributor.authorJurjus, Rosalyn A.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentAnatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiological Sciences
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:02:36Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:02:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractWhile a simple interrupted sutured anastomosis remains the gold standard in microsurgery, the introduction of the microanastomotic coupler device (MACD) has decreased procedure time and thrombosis risk, and improved the patency of venous anastomoses. The aim of this review is to update the evidence-based advantages of the MACD on arteries, based on clinical and experimental data, and to compare them to the hand-sewn approach in free flap transfer. All relevant articles that appeared in the PubMed and Medline/Ovid databases during the past three decades were reviewed. After exclusions, 11 studies were retained and discussed. The MACD had a generally shorter arterial anastomosis time, with improved flap survival and reduced ischaemia compared with the hand-sewn approach. The use of the MACD in arterial anastomosis is an efficient and less time-consuming alternative to the hand-sewn technique, provided that the selection of vessels is appropriate and the vessel diameter is large enough to do the anastomosis. © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.06.019
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85087217586
dc.identifier.pmid32620301
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31495
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnastomosis
dc.subjectArterial
dc.subjectCoupler
dc.subjectFree tissue transfer
dc.subjectSynovis
dc.subjectUnilink
dc.subjectAnastomosis, surgical
dc.subjectArteries
dc.subjectFree tissue flaps
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMicrosurgery
dc.subjectReconstructive surgical procedures
dc.subjectRetrospective studies
dc.subjectArtery
dc.subjectArtery anastomosis
dc.subjectArtery diameter
dc.subjectComparative effectiveness
dc.subjectEvidence based practice
dc.subjectFree tissue graft
dc.subjectGraft survival
dc.subjectHand sewn anastomosis
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectIntermethod comparison
dc.subjectIschemia
dc.subjectMedline
dc.subjectMicroanastomosis
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSystematic review (topic)
dc.subjectReconstructive surgery
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleReview and update on the use of the microanastomotic coupler device for arterial anastomosis in free tissue transfer
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021-2942.pdf
Size:
292.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format