Independent application of an analytical model for secondary neutron equivalent dose produced in a passive-scattering proton therapy treatment unit

dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Kyle J.
dc.contributor.authorTaddei, Phillip J.
dc.contributor.departmentRadiation Oncology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:12:21Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:12:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to independently apply an analytical model for equivalent dose from neutrons produced in a passive-scattering proton therapy treatment unit, H. To accomplish this objective, we applied the previously-published model to treatment plans of two pediatric patients. Their model accounted for neutrons generated by mono-energetic proton beams stopping in a closed aperture. To implement their model to a clinical setting, we adjusted it to account for the area of a collimating aperture, energy modulation, air gap between the treatment unit and patient, and radiation weighting factor. We used the adjusted model to estimate H per prescribed proton absorbed dose, D Rx, for the passive-scattering proton therapy beams of two children, a 9-year-old girl and 10-year-old boy, who each received intracranial boost fields as part of their treatment. In organs and tissues at risk for radiation-induced subsequent malignant neoplasms, T, we calculated the mass-averaged H, H T, per D Rx. Finally, we compared H T/D Rx values to those of previously-published Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of these patients' fields. H T/D Rx values of the adjusted model deviated from the MC result for each organ on average by 20.8 ± 10.0% and 44.2 ± 17.6% for the girl and boy, respectively. The adjusted model underestimated the MC result in all T of each patient, with the exception of the girl's bladder, for which the adjusted model overestimated H T/D Rx by 3.1%. The adjusted model provided a better estimate of H T/D Rx than the unadjusted model. That is, between the two models, the adjusted model reduced the deviation from the MC result by approximately 37.0% and 46.7% for the girl and boy, respectively. We found that the previously-published analytical model, combined with adjustment factors to enhance its clinical applicability, predicted H T/D Rx in out-of-field organs and tissues at risk for subsequent malignant neoplasms with acceptable accuracy. This independent application demonstrated that the analytical model may be useful broadly for clinicians and researchers to calculate equivalent dose from neutrons produced externally to the patient in passive-scattering proton therapy. © 2018 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aad1bc
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85051478974
dc.identifier.pmid29978833
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32731
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofPhysics in Medicine and Biology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnalytical model
dc.subjectOut-of-field dose
dc.subjectPediatric
dc.subjectProton radiotherapy
dc.subjectSecondary neutrons
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMonte carlo method
dc.subjectProton therapy
dc.subjectRadiotherapy dosage
dc.subjectRadiotherapy planning, computer-assisted
dc.subjectAnalytical models
dc.subjectHistology
dc.subjectMonte carlo methods
dc.subjectNeutrons
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectProton beams
dc.subjectTumors
dc.subjectAdjustment factors
dc.subjectPediatric patients
dc.subjectProton therapy beams
dc.subjectRadiation weighting factors
dc.subjectRadiation-induced
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectRadiotherapy planning system
dc.subjectProton beam therapy
dc.titleIndependent application of an analytical model for secondary neutron equivalent dose produced in a passive-scattering proton therapy treatment unit
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018-8033.pdf
Size:
1006.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format