Prediction of celiac disease at endoscopy

dc.contributor.authorBarada, Kassem A.
dc.contributor.authorHabib, Robert H.
dc.contributor.authorMalli, Ahmad H.
dc.contributor.authorHashash, Jana G.
dc.contributor.authorHalawi, Houssam M.
dc.contributor.authorMaasri, Karim A.
dc.contributor.authorTawil, Ayman N.
dc.contributor.authorMourad, Fadi H.
dc.contributor.authorSharara, Ala I.
dc.contributor.authorSoweid, Assaad M.
dc.contributor.authorSukkarieh, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorChakhachiro, Zaher I.
dc.contributor.authorJabbour, Mark N.
dc.contributor.authorFasano, Alessio
dc.contributor.authorSantora, Debbie
dc.contributor.authorArgüelles-Grande, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Joseph Anthony
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Peter H.R.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentPathology and Laboratory Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentClinical Research Institute
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:43:00Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:43:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBackground and study aims: Celiac disease is increasingly recognized worldwide, but guidelines on how to detect the condition and diagnose patients are unclear. In this study the prevalence and predictors of celiac disease were prospectively determined in a cross-sectional sample of Lebanese patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Patients and methods: Consecutive consenting patients (n=999) undergoing EGD answered a questionnaire and had blood taken for serologic testing. Endoscopic markers for celiac disease were documented and duodenal biopsies were obtained. The diagnosis of celiac disease was based on abnormal duodenal histology and positive serology. Risk factors were used to classify patients to either high or low risk for celiac disease. Independent predictors of celiac disease were derived via multivariate logistic regression. Results: Villous atrophy (Marsh 3) and celiac disease were present in 1.8% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. Most were missed on clinical and endoscopic grounds. The sensitivity of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) testing for the diagnosis of villous atrophy and celiac disease was 72.2% and 86.7%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) test was 34.2% and that of a strongly positive tTG was 80%. While the strongest predictor of celiac disease was a positive tTG (odds ratio [OR] 131.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 29.0-598.6), endoscopic features of villous atrophy (OR 64.8, 95%CI 10.7-391.3), history of eczema (OR 4.6, 95%CI 0.8-28.8), anemia (OR 6.7, 95%CI 1.2-38.4), and being Shiite (OR 5.4, 95%CI 1.1-26.6) significantly predicted celiac disease. A strategy of biopsying the duodenum based on independent predictors had a sensitivity of 93%-100% for the diagnosis of celiac disease, with an acceptable (22%-26%) rate of performing unnecessary biopsies. A strategy that excluded pre-EGD serology produced a sensitivity of 93%-94% and an unnecessary biopsy rate of 52%. Conclusion: An approach based solely on standard clinical suspicion and endoscopic findings is associated with a significant miss rate for celiac disease. A strategy to biopsy based on the derived celiac disease prediction models using easily obtained information prior to or during endoscopy, maximized the diagnosis while minimizing unnecessary biopsies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359200
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84893542934
dc.identifier.pmid24477366
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30171
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEndoscopy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectBiopsy
dc.subjectCeliac disease
dc.subjectCross-sectional studies
dc.subjectDecision support techniques
dc.subjectDiagnostic errors
dc.subjectDuodenum
dc.subjectEndoscopy, digestive system
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIntestinal mucosa
dc.subjectLogistic models
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectMultivariate analysis
dc.subjectProspective studies
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectSerologic tests
dc.subjectUnnecessary procedures
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectGliadin
dc.subjectProtein glutamine gamma glutamyltransferase
dc.subjectAnemia
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBlood analysis
dc.subjectDisease classification
dc.subjectDuodenum biopsy
dc.subjectEczema
dc.subjectEsophagogastroduodenoscopy
dc.subjectHistology
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman tissue
dc.subjectIntestine villus atrophy
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMedical history
dc.subjectPrediction
dc.subjectPredictive value
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectProspective study
dc.subjectQuestionnaire
dc.subjectRisk assessment
dc.titlePrediction of celiac disease at endoscopy
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2014-10632.pdf
Size:
467.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format