Grading reflective essays: The reliability of a newly developed tool- GRE-9
| dc.contributor.author | Makarem, Nisrine N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saab, Bassem Roberto | |
| dc.contributor.author | Maalouf, Grace J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Musharafieh, Umayya M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Naji, Fadila Bassem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rahme, Diana V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brome, Dayana | |
| dc.contributor.department | Family Medicine | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T11:42:27Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T11:42:27Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The main objective of this study is the development of a short reliable easy-to-use assessment tool in the aim of providing feedback to the reflective writings of medical students and residents. Methods: This study took place in a major tertiary academic medical center in Beirut, Lebanon. Seventy-seven reflective essays written by 18 residents in the department of Family Medicine at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) were graded by 3 raters using the newly developed scale to assess the scale reliability. Following a comprehensive search and analysis of the literature, and based on their experience in reflective grading, the authors developed a concise 9-item scale to grade reflective essays through repeated cycles of development and analysis as well as the determination of the inter-rater reliability (IRR) using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Krippendorff's Alpha. Results: The inter-rater reliability of the new scale ranges from moderate to substantial with ICC of 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.86, p < 0.01 and Krippendorff's Alpha was 0.49. Conclusions: The newly developed scale, GRE-9, is a short, concise, easy-to-use reliable grading tool for reflective essays that has demonstrated moderate to substantial inter-rater reliability. This will enable raters to objectively grade reflective essays and provide informed feedback to residents and students. © 2020 The Author(s). | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02213-2 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85092070294 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 32988408 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/30014 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Medical Education | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Grading tools | |
| dc.subject | Reflection | |
| dc.subject | Reflective articles | |
| dc.subject | Reflective writing | |
| dc.subject | Educational measurement | |
| dc.subject | Feedback | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Lebanon | |
| dc.subject | Reproducibility of results | |
| dc.subject | Writing | |
| dc.subject | Education | |
| dc.subject | Feedback system | |
| dc.subject | Human | |
| dc.subject | Reproducibility | |
| dc.title | Grading reflective essays: The reliability of a newly developed tool- GRE-9 | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1