Region of interest methylation analysis: a comparison of MSP with MS-HRM and direct BSP

dc.contributor.authorAkika, Reem
dc.contributor.authorAwada, Zainab
dc.contributor.authorMougharbil, Nahed
dc.contributor.authorKhoueiry-Zgheib, Nathalie
dc.contributor.departmentPharmacology and Toxicology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:39:29Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:39:29Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare and contrast three DNA methylation methods of a specific region of interest (ROI): methylation-specific PCR (MSP), methylation-sensitive high resolution melting (MS-HRM) and direct bisulfite sequencing (BSP). The methylation of a CpG area in the promoter region of Estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) was evaluated by these three methods with samples and standards of different methylation percentages. MSP data were neither reproducible nor sensitive, and the assay was not specific due to non-specific binding of primers. MS-HRM was highly reproducible and a step forward into categorizing the methylation status of the samples as percent ranges. Direct BSP was the most informative method regarding methylation percentage of each CpG site. Though not perfect, it was reproducible and sensitive. We recommend the use of either method depending on the research question and target amplicon, and provided that the designed primers and expected amplicons are within recommendations. If the research question targets a limited number of CpG sites and simple yes/no results are enough, MSP may be attempted. For short amplicons that are crowded with CpG sites and of single melting domain, MS-HRM may be the method of choice though it only indicates the overall methylation percentage of the entire amplicon. Although the assay is highly reproducible, being semi-quantitative makes it of lesser interest to study ROI methylation of samples with little methylation differences. Direct BSP is a step forward as it gives information about the methylation percentage at each CpG site. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-017-4110-7
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85021847534
dc.identifier.pmid28676996
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/29247
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.relation.ispartofMolecular Biology Reports
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBsp
dc.subjectDna methylation
dc.subjectMs-hrm
dc.subjectMsp
dc.subjectRoi
dc.subjectCpg islands
dc.subjectDna
dc.subjectEstrogen receptor alpha
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNucleic acid denaturation
dc.subjectPolymerase chain reaction
dc.subjectPromoter regions, genetic
dc.subjectSequence analysis, dna
dc.subjectSulfites
dc.subjectPrimer dna
dc.subjectEstrogen receptor alpha, human
dc.subjectHydrogen sulfite
dc.subjectSulfite
dc.subjectAmplicon
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectCpg island
dc.subjectDirect bisulfite sequencing
dc.subjectDna denaturation
dc.subjectDna determination
dc.subjectDna sequence
dc.subjectEra gene
dc.subjectEsr1 gene
dc.subjectGene
dc.subjectGene targeting
dc.subjectHigh resolution melting analysis
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectNormal human
dc.subjectPromoter region
dc.subjectReproducibility
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectGenetics
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.titleRegion of interest methylation analysis: a comparison of MSP with MS-HRM and direct BSP
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-8807.pdf
Size:
1.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format