The Value of Programmed Ventricular Extrastimuli From the Right Ventricular Basal Septum During Supraventricular Tachycardia

dc.contributor.authorHiguchi, Satoshi
dc.contributor.authorIto, Hiroyuki
dc.contributor.authorGerstenfeld, Edward P.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Adam C.H.
dc.contributor.authorLee, Byron K.
dc.contributor.authorMarcus, Gregory Maurice
dc.contributor.authorHsia, Henry H.
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Joshua David
dc.contributor.authorLee, Randall Jeffrey E.
dc.contributor.authorDewland, Thomas A.
dc.contributor.authorVedantham, Vasanth
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Zian H.
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Akash R.
dc.contributor.authorTanel, Ronn E.
dc.contributor.authorBadhwar, Nitish
dc.contributor.authorPellegrini, Cara N.
dc.contributor.authorKawamura, Mitsuharu
dc.contributor.authorShoda, Morio
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Chun
dc.contributor.authorRefaat, Marwan M.
dc.contributor.authorScheinman, Melvin M.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:45:33Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:45:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: The difference between the right ventricular (RV) apical stimulus–atrial electrogram (SA) interval during resetting of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) versus the ventriculoatrial (VA) interval during SVT (ΔSA-VAapex) is an established technique for discerning SVT mechanisms but is limited by a significant diagnostic overlap. Objectives: This study hypothesized that the difference between the RV SA interval during resetting of SVTs versus the VA interval during SVTs (ΔSA-VA) would yield a more robust differentiation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) when using the RV basal septal stimulation (ΔSA-VAbase) as compared to the RV apical stimulation (ΔSA-VAapex). Moreover, it was predicted that the ΔSA-VAbase might distinguish septal from free wall accessory pathways (APs) effectively. Methods: In this prospective study, 105 patients with AVNRTs (age 48 ± 20 years, 44% male) and 130 with AVRTs (age 26 ± 18 years, 54% male) underwent programmed ventricular extrastimuli delivered from both the RV basal septum and RV apex. The ΔSA-VA values were compared between the 2 sites. Results: The ΔSA-VAbase was shorter than the ΔSA-VAapex during AVRT (44 ± 30 ms vs 58 ± 29 ms; P < 0.001), and the opposite occurred during AVNRT (133 ± 31 ms vs 125 ± 25 ms; P = 0.03). A ΔSA-VAbase of ≧85 milliseconds had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 96% for identifying AVNRT. Furthermore, a ΔSA-VAbase of 45-85 milliseconds identified AVRT with left free wall APs (sensitivity 86%, specificity 95%), 20-45 milliseconds for posterior septal APs (sensitivity 72%, specificity 96%), and <20 milliseconds for right free wall or anterior/mid septal APs (sensitivity 86%, specificity 98%). Conclusions: The ΔSA-VAbase during programmed ventricular extrastimuli produced a robust differentiation between AVNRT and AVRT regardless of the AP location with ≧85 milliseconds as an excellent cutoff point. This straightforward technique further allowed localizing 4 general AP sites. © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2022.09.005
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85148726636
dc.identifier.pmid36858688
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30576
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAccessory pathway
dc.subjectPremature ventricular extrastimulus
dc.subjectRight ventricular base
dc.subjectSupraventricular tachycardia
dc.subjectVentriculoatrial interval
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHeart ventricles
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectProspective studies
dc.subjectTachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentry
dc.subjectTachycardia, supraventricular
dc.subjectVentricular septum
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectIsoprenaline
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectAtrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia
dc.subjectAtrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia
dc.subjectAtrioventricular septum
dc.subjectCoronary sinus
dc.subjectElectrocardiogram
dc.subjectElectrography
dc.subjectHeart right atrium
dc.subjectHeart right ventricle
dc.subjectHeart stimulation
dc.subjectHeart ventricle pacing
dc.subjectHis bundle
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHypertension
dc.subjectInterventricular septum
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMulticenter study
dc.subjectPredictive value
dc.subjectProspective study
dc.subjectQrs complex
dc.subjectReceiver operating characteristic
dc.subjectReentry tachycardia
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectVentricular effective refractory period
dc.subjectHeart ventricle
dc.titleThe Value of Programmed Ventricular Extrastimuli From the Right Ventricular Basal Septum During Supraventricular Tachycardia
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-988.pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format