Sevuparin for the treatment of acute pain crisis in patients with sickle cell disease: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Abstract
Background: There are no approved treatments for vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease. Sevuparin is a novel non-anticoagulant low molecular weight heparinoid, with anti-adhesive properties. In this study, we tested whether sevuparin could shorten vaso-occlusive crisis duration in hospitalised patients with sickle cell disease. Methods: We did a multicentre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in 16 public access clinical hospitals in the Netherlands, Lebanon, Turkey, Bahrain, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and Jamaica. Patients aged 12–50 years with a diagnosis of sickle cell disease (types HbSS, HbSC, HbSβ0-thalassaemia, or HbSβ+-thalassaemia) on a stable dose of hydroxyurea, hospitalised with vaso-occlusive crisis for parenteral opioid analgesia with a projected stay of more than 48 h were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated randomisation scheme to receive sevuparin (18 mg/kg per day) or placebo (NaCl, 0·9% solution) intravenously for 2–7 days until vaso-occlusive crisis resolution. All individuals involved in the trial were masked to treatment allocation. The analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The primary endpoint was time to vaso-occlusive crisis resolution defined as freedom from parenteral opioid use (in preceding 6–10 h); and readiness for discharge as judged by the patient or physician. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02515838. Findings: Between Oct 7, 2015, and Feb 10, 2019, 144 patients were randomly assigned and administered sevuparin (n=69) or placebo (n=75). The median age was 22·2 years (range 12·2–33·6), 104 (72%) 144 were adults (18 years or older), and 90 (63%) were male and 54 (37%) were female. The intention-to-treat analysis for the primary endpoint showed no significant difference in median time to vaso-occlusive crisis resolution between the sevuparin and placebo groups (100·4 h [95% CI 85·5–116·8]) vs 86·4 h [70·6–95·1]; hazard ratio 0·89 [0·6–1·3]; p=0·55). Serious adverse events occurred in 16 (22%) of 68 patients in the sevuparin group and in 21 (22%) of patients in the placebo group. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were pyrexia (17 [25%] in the sevuparin group vs 17 [22%] in the placebo group), constipation (12 [18%] vs 17 [22%]), and decreased haemoglobin (18 [26%] vs 9 [12%]). There were no deaths in the sevuparin group and there was one (1%) death in the placebo group after a hyper-haemolytic episode due to alloimmunisation. Interpretation: This result, as well as the results seen in other clinical studies of inhibitors of adhesion in sickle cell disease, suggest that selectin-mediated adhesion might be important in the initiation, but not maintenance of vaso-occlusion, indicating that strategies to treat vaso-occlusive crises differ from strategies to prevent this complication. Funding: Modus Therapeutics. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Description
Keywords
Acute pain, Adolescent, Adult, Anemia, sickle cell, Child, Female, Fever, Hemoglobins, Heparin, Humans, Male, Partial thromboplastin time, Placebo effect, Proportional hazards models, Treatment outcome, Young adult, C reactive protein, Hemoglobin, Heparinoid, Hydroxyurea, Opiate, Phosphate, Sevuparin, Sodium chloride, Acute chest syndrome, Adverse drug reaction, Alloimmunization, Analgesia, Anticoagulant therapy, Anticoagulation, Article, Bleeding, Blood clotting test, Blood transfusion, Body mass, Constipation, Continuous infusion, Controlled study, Double blind procedure, Drug efficacy, Drug safety, Electrocardiogram, Hospitalization, Human, International normalized ratio, Kidney function, Length of stay, Leukocyte, Liver function, Loading drug dose, Major clinical study, Masking, Monitoring, Multicenter study, Mutation, Nausea, Neutrophil, Outcome assessment, Pain, Pain intensity, Pain severity, Pharmacokinetic parameters, Phase 2 clinical trial, Platelet count, Prophylaxis, Randomization, Randomized controlled trial, Risk assessment, Sickle cell anemia, Sickle cell crisis, Study design, Vomiting, Clinical trial, Complication, Pathology, Proportional hazards model