Effects of Aftermarket Electronic Cigarette Pods on Device Power Output and Nicotine, Carbonyl, and ROS Emissions

dc.contributor.authorTalih, Soha
dc.contributor.authorKaraoghlanian, Nareg
dc.contributor.authorSalman, Rola
dc.contributor.authorHilal, Elissa
dc.contributor.authorPatev, Alison J.
dc.contributor.authorBell, Ashlynn D.
dc.contributor.authorFallah, Sacha
dc.contributor.authorEl-Hage, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorSaliba, Najat A.
dc.contributor.authorCobb, Caroline Oates
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Andrew James
dc.contributor.authorShihadeh, Alan Louis
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemistry
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Arts and Sciences (FAS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:33:43Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractAftermarket pods designed to operate with prevalent electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products such as JUUL are marketed as low-cost alternatives that allow the use of banned flavored liquids. Subtle differences in the design or construction of aftermarket pods may intrinsically modify the performance of the ENDS device and the resulting nicotine and toxicant emissions relative to the original equipment manufacturer's product. In this study, we examined the electrical output of a JUUL battery and the aerosol emissions when four different brands of aftermarket pods filled with an analytical-grade mixture of propylene glycol, glycerol, and nicotine were attached to it and puffed by machine. The aerosol emissions examined included total particulate matter (TPM), nicotine, carbonyl compounds (CCs), and reactive oxygen species (ROS). We also compared the puff-resolved power and TPM outputs of JUUL and aftermarket pods. We found that all aftermarket pods drew significantly greater electrical power from the JUUL battery during puffing and had different electrical resistances and resistivity. In addition, unlike the case with the original pods, we found that with the aftermarket pods, the power provided by the battery did not vary greatly with flow rate or puff number, suggesting impairment of the temperature control circuitry of the JUUL device when used with the aftermarket pods. The greater power output with the aftermarket pods resulted in up to three times greater aerosol and nicotine output than the original product. ROS and CC emissions varied widely across brands. These results highlight that the use of aftermarket pods can greatly modify the performance and emissions of ENDS. Consumers and public health authorities should be made aware of the potential increase in the level of toxicant exposure when aftermarket pods are employed. © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00213
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85179617556
dc.identifier.pmid38032319
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/28022
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Society
dc.relation.ispartofChemical Research in Toxicology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAerosols
dc.subjectElectronic nicotine delivery systems
dc.subjectNicotine
dc.subjectParticulate matter
dc.subjectPropylene glycol
dc.subjectReactive oxygen species
dc.subjectTobacco products
dc.subjectVaping
dc.subjectCarbonyl derivative
dc.subjectGlycerol
dc.subjectReactive oxygen metabolite
dc.subjectAerosol
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectElectric resistance
dc.subjectEnvironmental exposure
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectVaporization
dc.subjectTobacco
dc.titleEffects of Aftermarket Electronic Cigarette Pods on Device Power Output and Nicotine, Carbonyl, and ROS Emissions
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-264.pdf
Size:
3.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format