Bias in contraceptive provision to young women among private health care providers in south west Nigeria

dc.contributor.authorSieverding, Maia
dc.contributor.authorSchatzkin, Eric
dc.contributor.authorShen, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jenny X.
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Promotion and Community Health (HPCH)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:36:05Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:36:05Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractCONTEXT: Health care providers’ biases regarding the provision of contraceptives to adolescent and young adult women may restrict women’s access to contraceptive methods. METHODS: Two mystery client visits were made to each of 52 private-sector health care facilities and individual providers in South West Nigeria in June 2016. In one visit, the mystery client portrayed an unmarried, nulliparous adolescent, and in the other, the client portrayed a married adult woman with two children. During subsequent in-depth interviews, providers were read vignettes describing hypothetical clients with these same profiles, and were asked how they would interact with each. Descriptive analyses of mystery client interactions were combined with thematic analyses of the interview data. RESULTS: In greater proportions of married-profile visits than of unmarried-profile visits, mystery clients reported that providers had asked about past contraceptive use and method preference; the opposite was true in regard to providers’ using side effects to dissuade clients from practicing contraception. In in-depth interviews, providers expressed concerns about fertility loss among unmarried women who used hormonal contraceptives. Providers more commonly recommended condoms, emergency contraception and the pill for unmarried clients, and longer-acting methods for married clients. The restriction of methods was typically explained by providers of various backgrounds in terms of protecting younger, unmarried clients from damaging their fertility. CONCLUSIONS: Provider bias in the provision of contraceptives to adolescent and young adult women in South West Nigeria may affect quality of care and method choice. Interventions to reduce provider bias should go beyond technical training to address the underlying sociocultural beliefs that lead providers to impose restrictions that are not based on evidence. © 2018, Guttmacher Institute. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1363/44e5418
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85057568272
dc.identifier.pmid30028307
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/28516
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGuttmacher Institute
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAttitude of health personnel
dc.subjectBias
dc.subjectContraception
dc.subjectContraception behavior
dc.subjectContraceptive agents
dc.subjectFamily planning services
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth personnel
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInterviews as topic
dc.subjectMarriage
dc.subjectNigeria
dc.subjectParity
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectPregnancy in adolescence
dc.subjectPrivate sector
dc.subjectSingle person
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectContraceptive agent
dc.subjectAdolescence
dc.subjectContraceptive use
dc.subjectFertility
dc.subjectHealth care
dc.subjectHormone
dc.subjectWomens health
dc.subjectYoung population
dc.subjectAdolescent pregnancy
dc.subjectContraceptive behavior
dc.subjectFamily planning
dc.subjectHealth care personnel
dc.subjectHealth personnel attitude
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectInterview
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectSingle (marital status)
dc.subjectStatistical bias
dc.titleBias in contraceptive provision to young women among private health care providers in south west Nigeria
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018-8389.pdf
Size:
324.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format