Suggested policy and legislation reforms to reduce deleterious effect of pesticides in Lebanon

dc.contributor.authorAbou Zeid, Mohamad I.
dc.contributor.authorJammoul, Adla M.
dc.contributor.authorMelki, Khalil C.
dc.contributor.authorAbou-Jawdah, Yusuf A.
dc.contributor.authorKallassy Awad, Mireille
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Agriculture
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences (FAFS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:18:15Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:18:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractCountrywide pesticide management activities are resource draining, even for developed countries, which sometimes fall short in achieving the optimum protection against pesticides deleterious effects on humans and environment. Additionally, in Lebanon, basic flaws exist at different levels of pesticide management cycle. In this study, through an extensive review of relevant literature regarding the pesticides impact on humans and environment in Lebanon and adopted policies in existing legislation, several gaps have been identified. Accordingly, recommendations to reduce pesticide risk through a combination of reforms at the policy level and its tools, particularly legislation, are proposed. In our opinion, the starting point is to adopt a minimum list of lower risk pesticides supported by a combination of: “prescriptions” based on a comprehensive registration and an effective implementation systems, a suitable IPM/ICM government-supported credit system, traceability systems of agricultural commodities and pesticides containers, Pesticide stock management system to reduce the quantity of obsolete pesticides, and containers recycling system. For a global sustainability of pesticides risk reduction, a binding global intervention fostered by the UN, based on human rights for safe food, is called upon to ban hazardous pesticides-except those of WHO class IV- trafficking in developing countries scoring low in an international official assessment of their pesticides lifecycle management. At the same time, global funds should support pesticides alternatives and the enhancement of the developing countries capacities for pesticides lifecycle management, which is a part of a larger global matrix in risk reduction. © 2020 The Authors; Policy, legislations, reforms, pesticides, prescription, developing countries, risk reduction; Agricultural Policy; Crop Protection; Chemical Pest Control; Environmental Assessment; Legislation © 2020 The Authors
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05524
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85097462170
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/33970
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofHeliyon
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAgricultural policy
dc.subjectChemical pest control
dc.subjectCrop protection
dc.subjectDeveloping countries
dc.subjectEnvironmental assessment
dc.subjectLegislation
dc.subjectPesticides
dc.subjectPolicy
dc.subjectPrescription
dc.subjectReforms
dc.subjectRisk reduction
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectPest management
dc.titleSuggested policy and legislation reforms to reduce deleterious effect of pesticides in Lebanon
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6300.pdf
Size:
524.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format