What is left of the empiricism-nativism debate? - by Darine Mohamad Bassam Zaatari

dc.contributor.authorZaatari, Darine Mohamad Bassam
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophy
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date2001
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-13T07:04:54Z
dc.date.available2012-06-13T07:04:54Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.)--American University of Beirut. Department of Philosophy, 2001;"Advisor: Dr. Muhammad ALi Khalildi, Assistant Professor, Philosophy--Member of Committee: Dr. Waddah N. Nasr, Associate Professor, Philosophy--Member of Committee: Dr. Bashshar
dc.descriptionBibliography : leaves 77-80
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this thesis is to critically examine some contemporary formulations of the empiricism-nativism debate.--In the introduction. I present an overview of the historical debate, and under the assumption that the evidence supporting nativism is stron
dc.format.extentviii, 80 leaves
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/6122
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofTheses, Dissertations, and Projects
dc.subject.classificationT:004154 AUBNO
dc.subject.lcshCarruthers, Peter, 1952-. Human knowledge and human nature;Cowie, Fiona, 1963-. What's within
dc.subject.lcshEmpiricism -- History
dc.subject.lcshInnate ideas (Philosophy)
dc.subject.lcshNativism (Psychology)
dc.titleWhat is left of the empiricism-nativism debate? - by Darine Mohamad Bassam Zaatari
dc.typeThesis

Files