Current role of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine in the management of epilepsy

dc.contributor.authorBeydoun, Ahmad A.
dc.contributor.authorDupont, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Dong
dc.contributor.authorMatta, Maha
dc.contributor.authorNagire, Venkatramana
dc.contributor.authorLagae, Lieven G.
dc.contributor.departmentNeurology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:07:36Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:07:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractEpilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide. Despite a dramatic increase in treatment options over the past 30 years, it still ranks fourth in the world's disease burden. There are now close to 30 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), with more than two thirds introduced to the market after carbamazepine (CBZ) and one third after its derivative, oxcarbazepine (OXC). Following the introduction of these newer AEDs, the role of CBZ and OXC in the therapeutic armamentarium for seizure control and effective epilepsy management needs to be reviewed. The main guidelines list both CBZ and OXC as first-line options or second-line alternatives for the treatment of focal-onset epilepsy and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. While evidence suggests that overall AEDs have similar efficacy, some newer AEDs may be better tolerated than CBZ. In line with this, there have been changes in treatment patterns, with many variations across different countries. However, CBZ remains among the two or three most prescribed drugs for focal epilepsy in many countries, and is widely used across Europe, Africa, South America, and Asia, where it represents a good compromise between cost, availability, and effectiveness. OXC is among the first-choice options for the initial treatment of focal-onset seizures in several countries, including the US and China, where the oral suspension is commonly prescribed. This review provides guidance on the optimal use of these two drugs in clinical practice, including in children, the elderly, and in pregnancy. © 2020
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.10.018
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85097801040
dc.identifier.pmid33334546
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31576
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofSeizure
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCarbamazepine
dc.subjectEpilepsy guidelines
dc.subjectFocal onset seizures
dc.subjectOxcarbazepine
dc.subjectReal-world effectiveness
dc.subjectTherapeutic strategy
dc.subjectAnticonvulsants
dc.subjectEpilepsy
dc.subjectEpilepsy, generalized
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectTopiramate
dc.subjectLamotrigine
dc.subjectLevetiracetam
dc.subjectPhenobarbital
dc.subjectPhenytoin
dc.subjectAnticonvulsive agent
dc.subjectClinical practice
dc.subjectComorbidity
dc.subjectCost effectiveness analysis
dc.subjectDrug efficacy
dc.subjectDrug safety
dc.subjectDrug tolerability
dc.subjectElderly care
dc.subjectGenotype
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPractice guideline
dc.subjectPregnancy outcome
dc.subjectPrescription
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSouth america
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectTonic clonic seizure
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectTreatment planning
dc.subjectUnited states
dc.subjectGeneralized epilepsy
dc.titleCurrent role of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine in the management of epilepsy
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6350.pdf
Size:
725.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections