Split-dose menthol-enhanced PEG vs PEG-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation

dc.contributor.authorSharara, Ala I.
dc.contributor.authorHarb, Ali H.
dc.contributor.authorSarkis, Fayez S.
dc.contributor.authorChalhoub, Jean M.
dc.contributor.authorBadreddine, Rami J.
dc.contributor.authorMourad, Fadi H.
dc.contributor.authorOthman, Mahmoud
dc.contributor.authorMasri, Omar A.B.A.L.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:47:23Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:47:23Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractAIM: To compare the efficacy and palatability of 4 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte (PEG) plus sugar-free menthol candy (PEG + M) vs reduced-volume 2 L ascorbic acid-supplemented PEG (AscPEG). METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial setting, ambulatory patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either PEG + M or AscPEG, both split-dosed with minimal dietary restriction. Palatability was assessed on a linear scale of 1 to 5 (1 = disgusting; 5 = tasty). Quality of preparation was scored by assignment-blinded endoscopists using the modified Aronchick and Ottawa scales. The main outcomes were the palatability and efficacy of the preparation. Secondary outcomes included patient willingness to retake the same preparation again in the future and completion of the prescribed preparation. RESULTS: Overall, 200 patients were enrolled (100 patients per arm). PEG + M was more palatable than AscPEG (76% vs 62%, P = 0.03). Completing the preparation was not different between study groups (91% PEG + M vs 86% AscPEG, P = 0.38) but more patients were willing to retake PEG + M (54% vs 40% respectively, P = 0.047). There was no significant difference between PEG + M vs AscPEG in adequate cleansing on both the modified Aronchick (82% vs 77%, P = 0.31) and the Ottawa scale (85% vs 74%, P = 0.054). However, PEG + M was superior in the left colon on the Ottawa subsegmental score (score 0-2: 94% for PEG + M vs 81% for AscPEG, P = 0.005) and received significantly more excellent ratings than AscPEG on the modified Aronchick scale (61% vs 43%, P = 0.009). Both preparations performed less well in afternoon vs morning examinations (inadequate: 29% vs 15.2%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: 4 L PEG plus menthol has better palatability and acceptability than 2 L ascorbic acid-PEG and is associated with a higher rate of excellent preparations; Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT01788709. © The Author(s) 2015.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1938
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84922694054
dc.identifier.pmid25684963
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30736
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWJG Press
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Gastroenterology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBowel preparation
dc.subjectColonoscopy
dc.subjectEfficacy
dc.subjectMenthol
dc.subjectTolerability
dc.subjectAdministration, oral
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAscorbic acid
dc.subjectCandy
dc.subjectCathartics
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFlavoring agents
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectPatient satisfaction
dc.subjectPolyethylene glycols
dc.subjectProspective studies
dc.subjectTaste
dc.subjectTherapeutic irrigation
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectElectrolyte
dc.subjectLaxative
dc.subjectMacrogol
dc.subjectFlavoring agent
dc.subjectMacrogol derivative
dc.subjectSugar
dc.subjectAronchick and ottawa scale
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectAssessment of humans
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDiet restriction
dc.subjectEndoscopist
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectPalatability
dc.subjectProspective study
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectAnalogs and derivatives
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectDrug effects
dc.subjectLavage
dc.subjectOral drug administration
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.titleSplit-dose menthol-enhanced PEG vs PEG-ascorbic acid for colonoscopy preparation
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015-5006.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format