The complicated facial war injury: Pitfalls and mismanagement

dc.contributor.authorAbu-Sittah, Ghassan S.
dc.contributor.authorBaroud, Joe S.
dc.contributor.authorHakim, Christopher Alain
dc.contributor.authorWakil, Cynthia
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Plastic Surgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:12:45Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this paper is to share the authors' experience in the management of complicated facial war injuries using free tissue transfer. A discussion on the most commonly encountered pitfalls in management during the acute and complicated settings is presented in an effort to raise insight on facial war wound complications. Methodology: Two patients of complicated facial war injuries are presented to exemplify the pitfalls in acute and chronic management of the mandibular region in the first patient and the orbito-maxillary region in the second. The examples demonstrate free tissue transfer for early as well as late definitive reconstructions. Results and Discussion: A reconstruction algorithm or consensus regarding the optimal management plan of complicated facial war injuries is not attainable. The main principles of treatment, however, remain to decrease bacterial burden by adequate aggressive debridement followed by revisit sessions, remove of all infected hardware followed by replacement with external bony fixation if necessary and reviving the affected area by coverage with well-vascularized tissues and bone. The later is feasible via local, regional, or distant tissue transfer depending on the extent of injury, surgeon's experience, and time and personnel available. Conclusion: Free tissue transfer has revolutionized the management of complicated facial war injuries associated with soft tissue or bone loss as it has allowed the introduction of wellvascularized tissues into a hostile wound environment. The end result is a reduced infection rate, faster recovery time, and better functional outcome compared with when loco-regional soft tissue coverage or bone grafting is used. When soft tissue or bone loss is present, free tissue transfer should be the first management plan if time and personnel are available. The ultimate treatment of a complicated war wound remains prevention by accurate initial management.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003254
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85002410407
dc.identifier.pmid27922956
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32866
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFree tissue transfer
dc.subjectMandibular blast injuries
dc.subjectMandibular reconstruction
dc.subjectMaxillary blast injuries
dc.subjectMaxillary reconstruction
dc.subjectWar-related injuries
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectDebridement
dc.subjectFacial injuries
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFree tissue flaps
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectRhytidoplasty
dc.subjectTime factors
dc.subjectWarfare
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectAlgorithm
dc.subjectCase report
dc.subjectFree tissue graft
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectTime factor
dc.titleThe complicated facial war injury: Pitfalls and mismanagement
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-4774.pdf
Size:
304.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections