Assessing radiosensitivity of bladder cancer in vitro: A 2D vs. 3D approach

dc.contributor.authorBodgi, Larry
dc.contributor.authorBahmad, Hisham F.
dc.contributor.authorAraji, Tarek Z.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Choboq, Joelle
dc.contributor.authorBou-Gharios, Jolie
dc.contributor.authorCheaito, Katia A.
dc.contributor.authorZeidan, Youssef H.
dc.contributor.authorEid, Toufic A.
dc.contributor.authorGeara, Fady B.
dc.contributor.authorAbou-Kheir, Wassim G.
dc.contributor.departmentRadiation Oncology
dc.contributor.departmentAnatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiological Sciences
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:12:23Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:12:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bladder cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer among males worldwide. Current treatment strategies established for bladder cancer mainly consist of cystectomy yet advances in radiation therapy have pointed to the value of organ-preserving strategies in preserving patients' quality of life. Aim: To study and compare the radiosensitivity in two-dimension (2D) and physiologically-relevant three-dimension (3D) in vitro culture of three human bladder cancer cell lines, RT4, T24, and UM-UC-3. Materials and Methods: Clonogenic assay was performed to assess cells' radiosensitivity in 2D. Employing the 3D Matrigel-based cultures to enrich for cancer stem cells (CSCs) allowed us to assess the survival of this subpopulation of cells via evaluating the number, i.e., sphere forming unit (SFU), and the sizes of cultured spheres, formed from cells exposed to different radiation doses compared to non-irradiated cells. Results: Irradiating cells with increasing radiation doses revealed highest survival rates with RT4 cells in 2D, followed by T24 and UM-UC-3. In 3D, however, UM-UC-3 cells were shown to be the most radio-resistant as evidenced by the number of spheres formed, yet they displayed the least efficient volume reduction/regression (VR), whilst the volume decreased significantly for both RT4 and T24 cells. Sphere VR and sphere ratio (SR) values were then plotted against each other demonstrating a linear correlation between volume and number with RT4 and UM-UC-3 cell lines, but not T24. Lastly, multiple regression model was employed to evaluate the possibility of obtaining a function combining both 3D parameters, SR and VR, with the surviving fraction (SF) in 2D, and showed a linear regression for T24 cells only, with a correlation coefficient of 0.97 for the combined parameters. Conclusion: We were able to radiobiologically characterize 3 human bladder cancer cell lines showing differential effects of radiation between 2D and 3D culture systems, paving the way for achieving better assessment of radiosensitivity of bladder cancer in vitro. Copyright © 2019 Bodgi, Bahmad, Araji, Al Choboq, Bou-Gharios, Cheaito, Zeidan, Eid, Geara and Abou-Kheir.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00153
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85063347186
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32742
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Oncology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBladder cancer
dc.subjectCancer stem cells
dc.subjectModeling
dc.subjectRadioresistance
dc.subjectRadiosensitivity
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectCancer cell culture
dc.subjectCell death
dc.subjectCell growth
dc.subjectCell size
dc.subjectCell survival
dc.subjectCellular parameters
dc.subjectClonogenic assay
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectGrowth inhibition
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman cell
dc.subjectIn vitro study
dc.subjectPhenotype
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectRadiation dose
dc.subjectRt-4 cell line
dc.subjectSphere formation inhibition
dc.subjectSphere forming unit
dc.subjectSphere volume assessment
dc.subjectSurvival rate
dc.subjectT24 cell line
dc.subjectUm-uc-3 cell line
dc.titleAssessing radiosensitivity of bladder cancer in vitro: A 2D vs. 3D approach
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7734.pdf
Size:
2.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format