Functional clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: Current status and future prospects

dc.contributor.authorKarabudak, Rana
dc.contributor.authorDahdaleh, Maurice P.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Jumah, Mohammed A.
dc.contributor.authorAlroughani, Raed A.
dc.contributor.authorAlsharoqi, Isa Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorAlTahan, Abdulrahman M.
dc.contributor.authorBohlega, Saeed A.
dc.contributor.authorDaif, Abdulkader Kader M.
dc.contributor.authorDeleu, Dirk T.
dc.contributor.authorAmous, Amer
dc.contributor.authorInshasi, Jihad Said
dc.contributor.authorRieckmann, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSahraian, Mohammad Ali
dc.contributor.authorYamout, Bassem I.
dc.contributor.departmentNeurology
dc.contributor.departmentMultiple Sclerosis Center
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:07:28Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:07:28Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractFor decades, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) has been the principal measure of disability in clinical trials in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and in clinical practice. However, this test is dominated by effects on ambulation. Composite endpoints may provide a more sensitive measure of MS-related disability through the measurement of additional neurological functions. The MS Functional Composite (MSFC) includes a walking test (25-ft walk) plus tests of upper extremity dexterity (9-hole peg test) and cognitive function (Paced Auditory serial Addition test [PASAT]). Replacing PASAT with the Symbol Digit Modality test, a more sensitive test preferred by patients, may improve the clinical utility of the MSFC. In addition, disease-specific measures of QoL may be used alongside the MSFC (which does not include measurement of QoL). Clinical data suggest that disease-modifying therapies may delay or prevent relapse, and better composite measures will be valuable in the assessment of disease activity-free status in people with MS. © 2015 Elsevier B.V.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2015.03.004
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84930180445
dc.identifier.pmid26008936
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31520
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectClinical outcome measures
dc.subjectClinical trials
dc.subjectDisease-modifying therapies
dc.subjectMultiple sclerosis
dc.subjectDisability evaluation
dc.subjectEndpoint determination
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOutcome assessment (health care)
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectAlemtuzumab
dc.subjectBeta1a interferon
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBrain function
dc.subjectClinical assessment
dc.subjectClinical practice
dc.subjectClinical study
dc.subjectCognition
dc.subjectDexterity test
dc.subjectDrug efficacy
dc.subjectExpanded disability status scale
dc.subjectFunctional assessment
dc.subjectFunctional status
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMobilization
dc.subjectMotor dysfunction
dc.subjectNeurologic examination
dc.subjectNine hole peg test
dc.subjectPaced auditory serial addition test
dc.subjectRelapse
dc.subjectSensitivity analysis
dc.subjectSymbol digit modality test
dc.subjectTimed 25 ft walk
dc.subjectWalking
dc.subjectBioassay
dc.subjectDisability
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.titleFunctional clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: Current status and future prospects
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015-10137.pdf
Size:
557.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections