Role of peripheral pan-retinal photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept

dc.contributor.authorMansour, Ahmad Mohammed Farid Mahmoud
dc.contributor.authorEl Jawhari, Khalil M.
dc.contributor.authorArévalo, José Fernando
dc.contributor.departmentOphthalmology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:08:40Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:08:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of decreasing the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF by peripheral pan-retinal photocoagulation (PPRP) in managing diabetic macular edema (DME) in a subcategory of patients who cannot comply to strict anti-VEGF follow-up protocols. Materials and methods: This is a pilot prospective study. Consecutive patients with naïve DME were offered the choice of treatment and extend intravitreal ziv-aflibercept if they showed willingness for good compliance or PPRP with modified pro re nata intravitreal injections. Results: Six eyes of 3 patients had PPRP versus 4 eyes of 4 patients had injections only. The number of anti-VEGF injections was markedly decreased when PPRP was administered from a mean number of injections of 16.8 (range 13–21; mean follow-up 24.3 months) to a mean number of 4.5 (range 0–8; mean follow-up 33.7 months). Mean initial central macular thickness (CMT) was 462.0 mm in the injection only group vs 457.3 mm in the PPRP group. Mean final CMT was 462.0 in the injection only group vs 350.0 in the PPRP group. Baseline and final mean logMAR (Snellen equivalent) best-corrected visual acuity was initially and finally 0.84 (20/137) and 0.60 (20/80) in the injection only group and 0.70 (20/100) and 0.69 (20/98) in the PPRP group, respectively. The monthly cost for the PPRP group was one-third of the monthly cost for the injection only group. Conclusion: PPRP allowed for a decrease in the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in selected DME patients (sick, difficult to ambulate, financial burden, and fear of injections). © 2019 Mansour et al.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S199411
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85067560980
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31879
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDove Medical Press Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Ophthalmology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDiabetic retinopathy
dc.subjectLaser therapy
dc.subjectVascular endothelial growth factor
dc.subjectAflibercept
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBest corrected visual acuity
dc.subjectCentral macular thickness
dc.subjectClinical article
dc.subjectClinical effectiveness
dc.subjectClinical protocol
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectCost
dc.subjectDiabetic macular edema
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow up
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectLaser coagulation
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectPatient compliance
dc.subjectPeripheral panretinal photocoagulation
dc.subjectPilot study
dc.subjectProspective study
dc.titleRole of peripheral pan-retinal photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept
dc.typeArticle

Files