Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Flux, Nicotine Yield, and Particulate Matter Emissions: Impact of Device and Liquid Heterogeneity

dc.contributor.authorSoule, Eric K.
dc.contributor.authorMayne, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorSnipes, William
dc.contributor.authorDo, Elizabeth K.
dc.contributor.authorTheall, Travis
dc.contributor.authorHöchsmann, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorTalih, Soha
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Corby K.
dc.contributor.authorEissenberg, Thomas E.
dc.contributor.authorFuemmeler, Bernard F.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:33:42Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:33:42Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) heat a nicotine-containing liquid to produce an inhalable aerosol. ECIG power (wattage) and liquid nicotine concentration are two factors that predict nicotine emission rate (flux). These factors can vary greatly across devices and users. Aims and Methods: The purpose of this study was to examine ECIG device and liquid heterogeneity in real worldsettings and the association with predicted nicotine flux, nicotine yield, and total particulate matter (TPM) emissions. Past 30-day ECIG users (n = 84; mean age = 23.8 years [SD = 9.6]) reported device and liquid characteristics. Device power was measured via multimeter, device display screens, or obtained via labeling. Liquid nicotine concentration was obtained via labeling or through chemical analysis. Predicted nicotine flux, nicotine yield, and TPM associated with 10 4-second puffs were calculated for participants' primary devices. Results: Participants' primary devices were box mods (42.9%), disposable vapes (20.2%), and pod mods (36.9%). Most participants (65.5%) reported not knowing their primary device wattage. Rebuildable/box mods had the greatest power range (11.1-120.0 W); pod mod power also varied considerably (4.1-21.7 W). Unlike device wattage, most participants (95.2%) reported knowing their liquid nicotine concentration, which ranged from 3.0 to 86.9 mg/ml (M = 36.0, SD = 29.3). Predicted nicotine flux varied greatly across products (range =12.0-160.1 μg/s, M = 85.6 μg/s, SD = 34.3). Box mods had the greatest variability in wattage and predicted nicotine flux, nicotine yield, and TPM yield. Conclusions: ECIG device and liquid heterogeneity influence nicotine and other toxicant emissions. Better measurement of ECIG device and liquid characteristics is needed to understand nicotine and toxicant emissions and to inform regulatory policy. Implications: ECIG device and liquid heterogeneity cause great variability in nicotine flux and toxicants emitted. These data demonstrate the need to examine device and liquid characteristics to develop empirically informed, health-promoting regulatory policies. Policies may include setting product standards such that ECIG products cannot (1) have nicotine fluxes much greater than that of a cigarette to decrease the risk of dependence, (2) have nicotine fluxes that are very low and thus would have minimal appeal to cigarette smokers and may serve as starter products for youth or nontobacco users, and (3) emit large amounts of particulate matter and other toxicants. © The Author(s) 2022.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntac196
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85147834183
dc.identifier.pmid35965260
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/28020
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofNicotine and Tobacco Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectElectronic nicotine delivery systems
dc.subjectHazardous substances
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNicotine
dc.subjectParticulate matter
dc.subjectSmoking
dc.subjectTobacco products
dc.subjectVaping
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectLiquid nicotine
dc.subjectUnclassified drug
dc.subjectAdvertising
dc.subjectAfrican american
dc.subjectAlaska native
dc.subjectAmerican
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectAsian
dc.subjectChemical analysis
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDocumentation
dc.subjectEuropean american
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectNative hawaiian
dc.subjectPacific islander
dc.subjectPrediction
dc.subjectQuestionnaire
dc.subjectSelf report
dc.subjectTobacco use
dc.subjectTotal particulate matter
dc.subjectDangerous goods
dc.subjectElectronic cigarette
dc.subjectTobacco
dc.titleElectronic Cigarette Nicotine Flux, Nicotine Yield, and Particulate Matter Emissions: Impact of Device and Liquid Heterogeneity
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023-824.pdf
Size:
908.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format