Mobile and Web 2.0 interventions for weight management: An overview of review evidence and its methodological quality

dc.contributor.authorBardus, Marco
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Jane R.
dc.contributor.authorSamaha, Laya
dc.contributor.authorAbraham, Charles S.S.
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Promotion and Community Health (HPCH)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:36:02Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground: The use of Internet and related technologies for promoting weight management (WM), physical activity (PA), or dietary-related behaviours has been examined in many articles and systematic reviews. This overview aims to summarize and assess the quality of the review evidence specifically focusing on mobile and Web 2.0 technologies, which are the most utilized, currently available technologies. Methods: Following a registered protocol (CRD42014010323), we searched 16 databases for articles published in English until 31 December 2014 discussing the use of either mobile or Web 2.0 technologies to promote WM or related behaviors, i.e. diet and physical activity (PA). Two reviewers independently selected reviews and assessed their methodological quality using the AMSTAR checklist. Citation matrices were used to determine the overlap among reviews. Results: Forty-four eligible reviews were identified, 39 of which evaluated the effects of interventions using mobile or Web 2.0 technologies. Methodological quality was generally low with only 7 reviews (16%) meeting the highest standards. Suggestive evidence exists for positive effects of mobile technologies on weight-related outcomes and, to a lesser extent, PA. Evidence is inconclusive regarding Web 2.0 technologies. Conclusions: Reviews on mobile and Web 2.0 interventions for WM and related behaviors suggest that these technologies can, under certain circumstances, be effective, but conclusions are limited by poor review quality based on a heterogeneous evidence base. © 2016 The Author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw090
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84984629373
dc.identifier.pmid27335330
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/28491
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Public Health
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBody weight maintenance
dc.subjectCell phone
dc.subjectHealth promotion
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternet
dc.subjectMobile applications
dc.subjectReview literature as topic
dc.subjectSocial media
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectLiterature
dc.subjectMobile application
dc.subjectMobile phone
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.titleMobile and Web 2.0 interventions for weight management: An overview of review evidence and its methodological quality
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9386.pdf
Size:
221.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format