Dexmedetomidine for Improved Quality of Emergence From General Anesthesia: A Dose-Finding Study

dc.contributor.authorAouad, Marie T.
dc.contributor.authorZeeni, Carine A.
dc.contributor.authorAl Nawwar, Rony
dc.contributor.authorSiddik-Sayyid, Sahar M.
dc.contributor.authorBarakat, Hanane B.
dc.contributor.authorElias, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorYazbeck-Karam, V. G.
dc.contributor.departmentAnesthesiology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:40:26Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:40:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine provides smooth and hemodynamically stable emergence at the expense of hypotension, delayed recovery, and sedation. We investigated the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine for prevention of cough, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, and shivering, with minimal side effects. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 216 adult patients were randomly assigned to dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (D 1), 0.5 μg/kg (D 0.5), 0.25 μg/kg (D 0.25), or control (C). During emergence, cough, agitation, hemodynamic parameters, shivering, time to extubation, and sedation scores were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were analyzed. The respective incidences for the groups D 1, D 0.5, and D 0.25 versus group C were 48%, 64%, and 64% vs 84% for cough -corrected P <.003 between groups D 1 and C; 33%, 34%, and 33% vs 72% for agitation -corrected P <.003 between group C and each of the study groups; and 4%, 2%, and 7% vs 22% for shivering -corrected P =.03 and corrected P =.009 between groups D 1 and D 0.5 versus group C, respectively. The percent increase from baseline blood pressure on extubation for the 3 treatment groups was significantly lower than group C. Percent increase in heart rate was lower than control in groups D 1 and D 0.5 but not in group D 0.25. Time to extubation and sedation scores were comparable. However, more hypotension was recorded during the emergence phase in the 3 treatment groups versus group C. CONCLUSIONS: D 1 at the end of surgery provides the best quality of emergence from general anesthesia including the control of cough, agitation, hypertension, tachycardia, and shivering. D 0.5 also controls emergence phenomena but is less effective in controlling cough. The 3 doses do not delay extubation. However, they cause dose-dependent hypotension. © 2019 International Anesthesia Research Society.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002763
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85075276408
dc.identifier.pmid31743169
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/29469
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofAnesthesia and Analgesia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdrenergic alpha-2 receptor agonists
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAnesthesia recovery period
dc.subjectAnesthesia, general
dc.subjectCough
dc.subjectDexmedetomidine
dc.subjectDose-response relationship, drug
dc.subjectDouble-blind method
dc.subjectEmergence delirium
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHypertension
dc.subjectHypnotics and sedatives
dc.subjectHypotension
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectProspective studies
dc.subjectShivering
dc.subjectTachycardia
dc.subjectTime factors
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectFentanyl
dc.subjectLidocaine
dc.subjectMidazolam
dc.subjectPlacebo
dc.subjectPropofol
dc.subjectRocuronium
dc.subjectAlpha 2 adrenergic receptor stimulating agent
dc.subjectHypnotic sedative agent
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBlood pressure
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectCoughing
dc.subjectDose calculation
dc.subjectDouble blind procedure
dc.subjectEmergence agitation
dc.subjectExtubation
dc.subjectGeneral anesthesia
dc.subjectHeart rate
dc.subjectHemodynamic parameters
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectIncidence
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectOptimal drug dose
dc.subjectPostoperative complication
dc.subjectPostoperative nausea and vomiting
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectProphylaxis
dc.subjectProspective study
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectSedation
dc.subjectAdverse event
dc.subjectAnesthetic recovery
dc.subjectClinical trial
dc.subjectDose response
dc.subjectDrug effect
dc.subjectMulticenter study
dc.subjectTime factor
dc.titleDexmedetomidine for Improved Quality of Emergence From General Anesthesia: A Dose-Finding Study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7105.pdf
Size:
249.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections