Concordance between immunohistochemistry and microarray gene expression profiling for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 receptor statuses in breast cancer patients in Lebanon

dc.contributor.authorFakhri, Ghina B.
dc.contributor.authorAkel, Reem S.
dc.contributor.authorKhalil, Maya K.
dc.contributor.authorMukherji, Deborah M.
dc.contributor.authorBoulos, Fouad I.
dc.contributor.authorTfayli, Arafat Hussein
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentPathology and Laboratory Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Hematology Oncology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:52:16Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Accurate evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 is critical when diagnosing invasive breast cancer for optimal treatment. The current evaluation method is via immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this paper, we compared results of ER, PR, and HER2 from microarray gene expression to IHC in 81 fresh breast cancer specimens. Methods. Gene expression profiling was performed using the GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix Inc). Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status was performed using standard methods at a CAP-accredited pathology laboratory. Concordance rates, agreement measures, and kappa scores were calculated for both methods. Results. For ER, Kappa score was 0.918 (95% CI, 0.77.3-1.000) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%). For PR, Kappa score was 0.652 (95% CI, 0.405-0.849) and concordance rate was 86.4% (95% CI, 77%-93%). For HER2, Kappa score was 0.709 (95% CI, 0.428-0.916) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%). Conclusion. Our results are in line with the available evidence with the concordance rate being the lowest for the progesterone receptor. In general, microarray gene expression and IHC proved to have high concordance rates. Several factors can increase the discordance rate such as differences in sample processing. © 2018 Ghina B. Fakhri et al.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8530318
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85049855169
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31050
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHindawi Limited
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Breast Cancer
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEpidermal growth factor receptor 2
dc.subjectEstrogen receptor
dc.subjectProgesterone receptor
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectClinical assessment
dc.subjectClinical evaluation
dc.subjectClinical feature
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGene expression profiling
dc.subjectHistopathology
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman genome
dc.subjectHuman tissue
dc.subjectImmunohistochemistry
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMicroarray analysis
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectStaining
dc.titleConcordance between immunohistochemistry and microarray gene expression profiling for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 receptor statuses in breast cancer patients in Lebanon
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018-4301.pdf
Size:
1.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format