Use of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Non-Alzheimer’s Dementias

dc.contributor.authorNoufi, Paul E.
dc.contributor.authorKhoury, Rita
dc.contributor.authorJeyakumar, Sajeeka
dc.contributor.authorGrossberg, George Thomas
dc.contributor.departmentPsychiatry
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:11:55Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:11:55Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractNon-Alzheimer’s dementias constitute 30% of all dementias and present with major cognitive and behavioral disturbances. Cholinesterase inhibitors improve memory by increasing brain acetylcholine levels and are approved symptomatic therapies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). They have also been investigated in other types of dementias with potential cholinergic dysfunction. There is compelling evidence for a profound cholinergic deficit in Lewy Body dementia (LBD) and Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD), even to a greater extent than AD. However, this deficit is difficult to objectivize in vascular dementia (VaD) given the increased comorbidity with AD. Furthermore, there is minimal to no evidence for cholinergic loss in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Although cholinesterase inhibitors showed significant improvement in cognitive, behavioral, and functional measures in both LBD and PDD clinical trials, only rivastigmine is approved for PDD, due to the heterogeneity of the scales used, the duration of trials, and the limited sample sizes impacting data interpretation. Similarly, the interpretation of findings in VaD trials are limited by the lack of pre-defined inclusion criteria for ‘pure VaD’ and the wide heterogeneity of patients enrolled with respect to location and extent of cerebrovascular disease. In FTD patients, cholinesterase inhibitors were mostly associated with worsening of cognitive and behavioral symptoms. In non-AD dementias, cholinesterase inhibitors were well tolerated, with increased reports of mild to moderate cholinergic side effects and a non-significant trend for increased cardio and cerebrovascular events with rivastigmine in VaD, justifying their cautious use on a case-by-case basis, especially when there is evidence for cholinergic deficit. © 2019, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-019-00685-6
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85067919695
dc.identifier.pmid31201687
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32616
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofDrugs and Aging
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAcetylcholine
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectCholinesterase inhibitors
dc.subjectFrontotemporal lobar degeneration
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLewy body disease
dc.subjectRivastigmine
dc.subjectCholinesterase inhibitor
dc.subjectDonepezil
dc.subjectGalantamine
dc.subjectAnticholinergic syndrome
dc.subjectBehavior
dc.subjectCardiovascular disease
dc.subjectCerebrovascular disease
dc.subjectCognition
dc.subjectDiffuse lewy body disease
dc.subjectDrug efficacy
dc.subjectDrug tolerability
dc.subjectDrug use
dc.subjectFrontotemporal dementia
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMultiinfarct dementia
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectParkinson disease
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectMetabolism
dc.titleUse of Cholinesterase Inhibitors in Non-Alzheimer’s Dementias
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7299.pdf
Size:
797.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections