Reporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 4 - reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using routinely collected electronic records – room for improvement

dc.contributor.authorMcCall, Stephen J.
dc.contributor.authorImran, Mahrukh
dc.contributor.authorHemkens, Lars G.
dc.contributor.authorMc Cord, Kimberly Alba
dc.contributor.authorKwakkenbos, Linda
dc.contributor.authorSampson, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorJawad, Sena
dc.contributor.authorZwarenstein, Merrick F.
dc.contributor.authorRelton, Clare
dc.contributor.authorLangan, Sinead M.
dc.contributor.authorMoher, David
dc.contributor.authorFrob̈ert, Ole
dc.contributor.authorThombs, Brett D.
dc.contributor.authorGale, Chris
dc.contributor.authorJuszczak, E.
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Research on Population and Health (CRPH)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:17:15Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:17:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjective: To describe characteristics of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted using electronic health records (EHRs), including completeness and transparency of reporting assessed against the 2021 CONSORT Extension for RCTs Conducted Using Cohorts and Routinely Collected Data (CONSORT-ROUTINE) criteria. Study Design: MEDLINE and Cochrane Methodology Register were searched for a sample of RCTs published from 2011–2018. Completeness of reporting was assessed in a random sample using a pre-defined coding form. Results: Of the 183 RCT publications identified, 122 (67%) used EHRs to identify eligible participants, 139 (76%) used the EHR as part of the intervention and 137 (75%) to ascertain outcomes. When 60 publications were evaluated against the CONSORT 2010 item and the corresponding extension for the 8 modified items, four items were 'adequately reported' for most trials. Five new reporting items were identified for the CONSORT-ROUTINE extension; when evaluated, one was ‘adequately reported’, three were reported ‘inadequately or not at all’, the other ‘partially’. There were, however, some encouraging signs with adequate and partial reporting of many important items, including descriptions of trial design, the consent process, outcome ascertainment and interpretation. Conclusion: Aspects of RCTs using EHRs are sub-optimally reported. Uptake of the CONSORT-ROUTINE Extension may improve reporting. © 2021
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.011
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85117769886
dc.identifier.pmid34525409
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/33716
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCollected
dc.subjectConsort-routine
dc.subjectData
dc.subjectExtension
dc.subjectHealth
dc.subjectRoutinely
dc.subjectElectronic health records
dc.subjectElectronics
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPublications
dc.subjectResearch design
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectElectronic health record
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman experiment
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMedline
dc.subjectRandom sample
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectMethodology
dc.subjectPublication
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.titleReporting transparency and completeness in trials: Paper 4 - reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using routinely collected electronic records – room for improvement
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-2192.pdf
Size:
854.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format