Simulation-based curriculum development: lessons learnt in Global Health education

dc.contributor.authorSawaya, Rasha Dorothy
dc.contributor.authorMrad, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorRajha, Eva
dc.contributor.authorSaleh, Rana
dc.contributor.authorRice, Julie
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:41:50Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:41:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: Simulation based medical education (SBME) allows learners to acquire clinical skills without exposing patients to unnecessary risk. This is especially applicable to Emergency Medicine training programs where residents are expected to demonstrate proficiency in the management of time critical, low frequency, and highly-morbidity conditions. This study aims to describe the process through which a SBME curriculum was created, in a limited simulation resource setting at a 4-year Emergency Medicine (EM) residency program at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Methods: A case-based pilot simulation curriculum was developed following Kern’s 6 step approach to curriculum design. The curricular objectives were identified through an anonymous survey of the program’s residents and faculty. Curriculum outcomes were assessed, and the curriculum was revised to address curricular barriers. Evaluations of the revised curriculum were collected during the simulation sessions and through a whole revised curriculum evaluation at the end of the first year of its implementation. Results: 14/20 residents (70%) and 8/8 faculty (100%) completed the needs assessment from which objectives for the pilot curriculum were developed and implemented through 6 2-h sessions over a 1-year period. Objectives were not met and identified barriers included cost, scheduling, resources, and limited faculty time. The revised curriculum addressed these barriers and 24 40-min sessions were successfully conducted during the following year. The sessions took place 3 at a time, in 2-h slots, using the same scenario to meet the objectives of the different learners’ levels. 91/91 evaluations were collected from participants with overall positive results. The main differences between the pilot and the revised curricula included: a better understanding of the simulation center resources and faculty’s capabilities. Conclusion: Simulation-based education is feasible even with limited-resources. However, understanding the resources available, and advocating for protected educator time are essential to implementing a successful EM simulation curriculum. © 2021, The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02430-9
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85098889541
dc.identifier.pmid33413346
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/29885
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Medical Education
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCurriculum development
dc.subjectEducation in low resource settings
dc.subjectSimulation curriculum
dc.subjectClinical competence
dc.subjectCurriculum
dc.subjectEmergency medicine
dc.subjectHealth education
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternship and residency
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGlobal health
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman experiment
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMedical education
dc.subjectNeeds assessment
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectResident
dc.subjectSimulation training
dc.subjectEducation
dc.titleSimulation-based curriculum development: lessons learnt in Global Health education
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021-5836.pdf
Size:
293.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format